Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

  • SUE THE BASTARDS
  • AEAE
  • AEJE
  • AEIPR
  • Rentamark
  • Archrive
  • PAGE 2
 

2010 DARWIN AWARD BARAK OBAMA NOMINATION(S) ANNOUNCED

1/4/2010

2 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-AT A GALA EVENT ON JANUARY 1, 2010 THE CHARLES DARWIN AWARD NOMINATION ACADEMY ANNOUNCED THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE BEEN NOMINATED TO RECEIVE THE 2010 DARWIN AWARD. The first person named was Umar Farouk Abdulmutalliab, a wealthy Nigerian who is accused of trying to down Northwest Airlines Flight 253 with a hidden bomb in his underwear. The second person nominated was Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano for the way she handled the botched Christmas Day airline bombing by immediately saying after flight 253 was secure that, “Mr. Abdulmutalliab acted alone and was not part of a larger plot.” The third Nomination goes to Barak Obama for appointing Janet Napolitano to be Homeland Security Secretary and for keeping Ms. Napolitano Homeland Security Secretary even after she made those statements on the three Sunday talk shows assisting that "the system worked!"

In the legal category, attorneys Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman from the law firm of Roylance, Abrams and Goodman LLC received Darwin nominations for their ability to avoid process of service of summons long enough in their opinion to have escaped possible prosecution of a defamation lawsuit because of the statute of limitations on the original claim. In addition Stoller has caused Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman to be charged with a “Criminal” contempt petition http://www.filefront.com/14756757/Lance-G.-Johnson-Charged-with-perjury0001.pdf of which they were finally served with summons and complaints on or about Dec 23, 2009 . There next court hearing in Chicago Illinois is January 19, 2010 on the Criminal Contempt matter. http://www.filefront.com/15157881/Dec-15-2009-Order0001.pdf/
Stoller response to Johnson's attorney attempt to strike Stoller's Criminal Contempt petition.
http://www.filefront.com/15191477/responsetomotiontostrike_doc.pdf
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman are considered innocient until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of all charges.   AEAE JUDGE OF THE YEAR 2009 - STEPHEN V. WILSON 01/02/2010 1 Comments Edit | Settings | Delete Are you sure you want to delete this post? This action is permanent. Yes, delete postNo, keep post CHICAGO-(AEJE)-THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF JUDICIAL ETHICS HAS NOMINATED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE STEPHEN V. WILSON FROM THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA THE JUDGE OF THE YEAR http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/CACD/JudgeReq.nsf/2fb080863c88ab47882567c9007fa070/21bd64b116e74bdf8825681900830a31?OpenDocument.  JudgeWilson  in J.C v. Beverly Hills Unified School Cistrict (D.D. Cal Nov 16, 2009) Case No 08-03824 SVW , the United States central district Court of California issued an order on Nov 16, 2009  extremely significatnt to supporting the First Amendment Rights of parties (studends) who use the Internet. 
http://www.filefront.com/15268831/Jc%20v.%20beverly%20Nov%2016%2C%202009%20decision.pdf This is your new blog post. Click here and start typing, or drag in elements from the top bar.   AEAE- PREDICTIONS FOR 2010 01/02/2010 2 Comments Edit | Settings | Delete Are you sure you want to delete this post? This action is permanent. Yes, delete postNo, keep post Search: Predictions for 2010

CHICAGO-AEAE- 'Tis the time when mystics gaze into their crystal balls and tell us what awaits next year. Yeah, we know all about the predicted doomsday in 2012, but what about 2010?

Who believes in these clairvoyant visions? More than one person out of four, according to a 2005 poll.

Prophets

We may not have to wait three years: this storied seer of the 16th century said the end of times could begin next year. A blind Bulgarian mystic predicted World War III will start in 2010.

Igor Panarin isn't a psychic, but he's got some 2010 bad news for the U.S. Some people blame another 2010 doomsday prophet for a shooting rampage in a church.

Psychics

Sylvia Browne is a household name in psychic circles. She sees Stoller making a big come back in 2010, if he can stay away from Lisara, his track record with women is wonting. Browne also sees a higher rate of skin cancer in kids, a cure for the cold and a startling prediction with a fuzzy timeline.

One old-school psychic had a few hits for 2009, but his prediction that entertainers would take their shows onto trains didn't pan out.   AEAE > HAPPY NEW YEAR 2010, THE BEST "NEW" YEAR OF ALL TIMES! 01/01/2010 3 Comments Edit | Settings | Delete Are you sure you want to delete this post? This action is permanent. Yes, delete postNo, keep post IN 2010 'TELL IT TO THE JUDGE!'   Brooke Mueller now is demanding an additional $1 million from Charlie Sheen in order to "make" up 12/31/2009 4 Comments Edit | Settings | Delete Are you sure you want to delete this post? This action is permanent. Yes, delete postNo, keep post CHARLES SHEEN'S wife Brooke Mueller now is demanding an additional $1 million to her prenuptial agreement according to a report. Brooke said if Tiger Woods wife got 78 million, Charlie Sheen can give me at least another million. Brooke said that she would then have her lawyer Yale Galanter file a motion to modify the restraining order against Sheen so that they can get together and try to resolve their issues privately in their bedroom. Brooke said that they are very much in love however before she is willing to attempt work anything out she wants to see Charlie's “good” faith by depositing a million dollars in her private checking account according to a report. Brook said, “I might start to like Charlie again.”
UPDATE:  January 1, 2010 And another one bites the dust! It looks like Charlie Sheen and his wife Brooke Mueller are headed to divorce court after all. We have now learned that  “Brooke’s been wanting a divorce for at least two months, but she was holding out until Charlie signed a new contract [for his sitcom],” according to one  source. Charlie reportedly threatened to kill Brooke on Christmas with a knife after  she told him that she wanted a divorce . Just days after the altercation, Brooke was seen partying at a club with another younger movie star that she has been spending her nights with according to the same source, "Brooke is such a "sweet" girl."
 


  CHARLIE SHEEN AND HIS WIFE BROOKE DECIDED TO RECONCILE 12/31/2009 1 Comments Edit | Settings | Delete Are you sure you want to delete this post? This action is permanent. Yes, delete postNo, keep post ASPEN, COLORADO-CHRISTMAS DAY 2009 Charlie Sheen, 44, who starred in films including Platoon and Wall Street, was arrested in the ski resort of Aspen following an argument with his wife of 19 months, Brooke Mueller, 32. Charlie Sheen's was arrest in Aspen, Colo., for allegedly placing a knife against wife Brooke Mueller's throat after he sat down for dinner. His wife told Sheen, “I have something to tell you.” Sheen said, “Don't bother me I watching a football game.” Brooke said, “I want a divorce!” Sheen said, “I can't hear you, my team is on the one yard line.” Brooke screemed “I want a divorce!” “You what?” “I want a divorce!”

“You tell me this while I'm watching my football game on Christmas!”

“I want a divorce!”

It is reported that Sheen then took a knife and held it to Brooke's neck and said, “I sue you for the rest of you life if you divorce me!”

Brooke said, “I rather have you kill me!”

Sheen said, “Suing you would be more fun!”

Brooke called 911 and had he husband locked up. Sheen posted $8,000 bond and was released. Threatening to have Brooked sued for the rest of her life isn't enough to break up their marriage. Seems they have decided reconciliation is the way to go. "Brooke and Charlie are very passionate about each other, they love each other and want to try and save their marriage," Mueller's attorney, Yale Galanter, told People magazine on Wednesday. "They had a bad night and want to get beyond it.

Some women who can't, do spend the “rest of their lives in court as defendants” according to a report at www.law.com   << Previous
  • var sc_project=4947193; var sc_invisible=0; var sc_partition=57; var sc_click_stat=1; var sc_security=\'153ea0d9\'; ', initialvalueset: '0', referenceproperty: '' }, '85662917': { cfpid: '85662917', ucfpid: '717710976237093', propertyresult: 'left', initialvalueset: '0', referenceproperty: '' } } }" type=hidden name=pfield>
  • Author The purpose of this Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The author, Leo Stoller is a
    LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. Leo Stoller graduated
    from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. Leo Stoller is the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Expert and legal ethics expert. Leo Stoller is the Director of Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. Leo Stoller has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. Leo Stoller
    is ready to go to work for you: contact information: Leo Stoller, 7115 W. North Avenue #272, Oak Park, Illinois 60302. Email
    ldms4@hotmail.com
    312-545-4554
    Copyright Leo Stoller 2009, all rights reserved. I accept no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission. (For forty one years)
     "Litigation is the Sea I swim in,
    Litigation is the Air I Breathe
    Litigation is War,
    Welcome to the Front!"
    SEE YOU IN COURT!!!




  • Archives January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009


  • Categories All


  • RSS Feed

Google Inc.,'s attorney Michael T. Zeller received a Darwin nomination as well as Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel.

2 Comments
Jan
1/4/2010 01:57:02 pm

Lady GAGA was there, she was great!

Reply
Air Jordan link
2/28/2011 01:42:21 pm

There is no cosmetic for beauty like happiness.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
    Internships not available now
    ​


     Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
    FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​
    YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
    Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
     The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
     Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that  supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
     The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
    LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. 
    The author(s)  graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. The Author(s)  are the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics experts  and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation  Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions.  AEAE, P.O.  Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
    312-545-4554
    Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE  Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
     "Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
    Litigation is the Air We Breathe
    Litigation is War,

    Welcome to the Front!"


     To Prove Defamation Case?
    What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm. 
    The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation 

    The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

    “[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
    AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

    ​AEAE has the legal  right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators,  business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE  18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

    VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

    DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.



    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    July 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    January 2015
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Categories
    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested  persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

    All
    Jewelry Frauds
    Scams
    Yellow Diamonds

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.