A VALENTINE TO AMBER HEARD

2/13/2012

Amber I have to tell you about a dream that I had about you last night. It was Valentine’s Day. You and I were having dinner in Down Town Chicago on Michigan Ave and Wacker in the Bandera Restaurant. You were in Chicago for a photo shot with the Leo Burnett Advertising Agency. I started to tell you how much you mean to me, after I poured you a glass of Mondavi Wine. “I think I love you Amber.”
“I don't love you,” you said.
“Why not?”
“Because you're not Ryan Gosling! Your old, your not handsome, your a three time loser, you don't have any money...and there are a million other men that are richer and more famous then you that want me.”
“Your breaking my heart.”
“I do that all of the time, I'm in the business of breaking men's hearts, you'll get over it!”
“Well I guess we do not have anything else to say.”
“Your right, you can drive me back to O’Hare Airport after I pick up my bags from the Michigan Avenue Marriott Hotel.”
We finished dinner, then left the restaurant walked north on Michigan Ave toward the Marriott across the famous Michigan Avenue Bridge. It was ice cold and snowy. There were large chunks of Ice floating in the Chicago River below the bridge. As we walked across the bridge, suddenly a section of the bridge broke off, separating us. You were now standing precariously on a ledge, looking down as the icy river below. We were separated by two feet of open space. Both of us looked down at the river below. The bridge was disintegrating all around us. I tried but couldn’t reach you. It looked as if any moment you were going to fall into the icy river below. I leaned forward over the open space in the bridge. I said, “Amber give me your hand.” You screamed "No!". You looked terrified. Suddenly another chunk of the Bridge fell into the water below. You screamed! I said, “Give me your hand.” "You said, "No!" You looked like you were in a state of shock and were unable to move. Another chunk of the bridge fell. It looked like any minute that ledge that you were standing on was going to give way. I leaped over the two foot opening in the bridge, grabbed you and as I leaped back holding you tightly to my body, the ledge that you were previously standing on fell into the icy cold Chicago River below. We both fell on a staple portion of the remaining bridge. I quickly carried you off the bridge in my arms, just prior to it collapsing into the river below. When we finally got to safety,
you said,
“Why did you risk your life to save mine, you could have just left me there on the bridge and saved your own life?”
“Because I love you and that my life would not be worth anything if you were not a part of it.”
“I love you too, because you were willing
to lose your life to save mine,
You and you alone are my
sweet Valentine.”
“But what about Ryan Gosling?”
“Forgot about Ryan Gosling,
let's go to my hotel.”
By Leo Stoller View this Author's Spotlight

1 Comment

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics