BANK OF AMERICA CHAIRMAN WALTER E. MASSEY, CEO BRIAN MOYNHAN AND JOE L. PRICE CHARGED IN INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION IN CHICAGO ILLINOIS COURT

2/10/2010

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-IN AN INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION FILED IN COOK COUNTY COURT THE CHAIRMAN OF BANK AMERICA WALTER E. MASSEY, THE FORMER CEO KENNETH D. LEWIS, THE CURRENT CEO JOE L. PRICE, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER have been charged with conspiracy. It is not required to prove that each member of a conspiracy committed an overt act within the statute of limitations. Hyde v. United States, United States v. Read, 658 F.2d 1225, 1234 (7th Cir.1981) The indirect criminal contempt charges alleged here in are ones that were committed outside of the presence of the Court1. Ergo Indirect Criminal Contempt proceedings are mandated. The nature of the charge against Bank of American's attorney STEVEN R. SMITH is that he presented a “false” affidavit”. That charge is perjury, false swearing by a witness 720 ILCS 5/32-3(a) and . 720 ILCS 5/32-2, a Class 3 felony “see also People v. Hagopian, 343 Ill. App. 640, 99 N.E.2d 726 (1st Dist. 1951). The nature of the charges against Smith's “bag man” attorney Michael Werich is Subornation of Perjury 720 ILCS 5/32-2, 720 ILCS 5/32-3(a) The charge against the Respondent’s Law Firm of Bryan Cave LLP is Subornation of Perjury a Class 4 felony 720 ILCS 5/32-2, 720 ILCS 5/32-3(a) . The Law Firm of Bryan Cave LLP is attempting to proceed before the Illinois trial court Judge Leroy Martin using the falsely sworn affidavit of attorney Steven R. Smith dated January 22, 2010. In that sworn affidavit Steven R. Smith denies under oath that he said, “I know Judge Mason and she will not deal with your nonsense!” There is irrefutable evidence consisting of a telephonic tape recording that Mr. Smith consented to, which clearly has Mr. Steven R. Smith stating, “I know Judge Mason and she will not deal with your nonsense!” It is the opinion of legal experts that when that tape recording of Mr. Steven R. Smith voice is played in court it will lead to the convictions of all of the parties charged. This story continues click on the following link http://www.rentamark.net/3/post/2010/01/bank-of-america-ceo-brian-moynihan-makes-damming-admissions-under-oath-to-the-financial-crisis-inquiry-commission.html

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: WALTER E. MASSEY, JOE L. PRICE , BRIAN MOYNHAN, Steven R. Smith, Michael Werich, the Law Firm of Bryan Cave LLP are considered innocent of all charges until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

6 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Fool Watch

2/10/2010 12:16:18 am

Anyone seen leo, there a courtroom looking for a fool, particularly one whose ex says he has erectile disfunction

sunshine

2/10/2010 02:04:06 am

i know u will never post on this blog but thank u mr chili for telling the truth he and chris destroyed my family with there lies

fed watcher

2/10/2010 11:07:35 am

Hearing that Leo is sexually impotent explains why his wife embraced others and socially speaking explains why Leo as a cuckold lashes out at other Men. He is feeling inferior and knowing his ex is receiving the attention of well equipped men has given him no way of feeling significant other then threatening and making outlandish claims. What he really wants is to orally service those same men, a thought UI can assure you his ex finds hilarious, HEY limp dick do you really want to watch?

Professor Leegature

2/11/2010 10:01:23 am

A recently discovered sonnet of William Shakespeare deals with the subject of the “wimpy” “Limpi” dicks which has some relevance to recently mentioned topic know as the “wimpy” dick.

What price is it to Lust after thee “Rust”
A wimpy, Limpi Dick is thee price,
For those Gentlemen who continue
to lust for thee “rust”
will end up as they must,
with a “wimpy” “Limpi” Dick
Thee cure is to lust
for thee bust
of thee youthful maiden,
and to forget thee rusty old musty “lust”

Air Jordan link

2/28/2011 01:40:22 pm

Let us be grateful to people who make us happy; they are the charming gardeners who make our souls blossom.

herve leger link

3/25/2012 05:42:00 am

This is the best weblog for anyone who wants to know about this subject. You know a lot its virtually challenging to argue with you . You certainly place a new spin on the topic thats been composed about for many years. Fantastic things, just fantastic!

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics