BARRINGTON ILLINOIS CUBA TOWNSHIP DAVID F. NELSON, PRISCILLA H. ROSE DONALD F. GRIFFITH, RICHARD J. KOSNER, ARUTHER I. RICE ROBERTA A. SAVACHA CHARGED WITH CIVIL RACKETEERING

10/23/2010

BARRINGTON, ILLINOIS (AEAE)- THE Cuba Township HIGHWAY COMMISSIONER, A REPUBLICAN http://www.cubaroads.com/ and his bag man Illinois Attorney Michael J. Gauthier along with
David F. Nelson,
Priscilla H. Rose

Rebecca M. Tonigan
Donald F. Griffith
John J. Mumaw
Arthur L. Rice III
Roberta A. Svacha have been charged in a civil racketeering law suit filed in Lake County Illinois Case No. 10 L 884. The charge consist of aiding and abettingdding the Cuba Township Highway Commissioner run his law practice out of the Cuba Town Ship Highway commissioner office here, which is illegal in Illinois. The Cuba Township High Commissioner http://www.cubaroads.com/ is also charged with witness tempering, subornation of the perjury of Janine M. Mazzocco before a Lake County Grand jury. Janine M. Massocco lied under oath to a Lake County Grand Jury when she stated under oath that she received no funds from a check that was disbursed as well known to the Cuba Town ship Highway commissioner and the Lake County Prosecutors office http://www.lakecountyil.gov/statesattorney/default.htm according to the charges.

According to the complaint the Cuba Township Highway Commissioner used his political clout to procure a fraudulent larceny indictment in order to obtain a 1/3 of a million dollars which is being held in a trust account in Lake County. The Cuba Township Highway Commissioner got his client Janine M. Mazzocco to perjury herself before a Lake County Grand Jury in order to take a collateral advantage in a pending civil case which involves over one million dollars in cash which is being held pending the out come of the civil suit. In a related whistle blower lawsuit it is alleged that the Lake County Prosecutors office handling the prosecution of the criminal case is well aware that the Cuba Township Highway Commissioner operates his law practice out of his Cuba Township Highway commissioners office, http://www.cubaroads.com/ receiving telephone calls from clients while he is on the State payroll in violation of Illinois Law. It is also alleged that the Lake County Prosecutor's office has knowledge that the indictment that resulted from Janine M. Mazzocco's perjury testimony is void ab initio and represents a clear fraud on the court according to the charges in the Whistle Blower Complaint. This matter has also been presented to the Justice Department for an Investigation into these criminal charges. None of the above parties would return phone calls regarding this story.

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: All parties in the above case are considered innocent of all charges until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.Any one who has information on these charges please email ldms4@hotmail.com

4 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Take off every 'ZIG!! For great JUSTICE!!!

10/22/2010 07:55:00 pm

Dear everybody in the world:

All your base are belong to us.

Your friend,
LEO STOLLER

Delusional

10/22/2010 11:51:10 pm

Delusional Leo, very very delusional

Idiot

10/23/2010 03:38:45 pm

Damn it, Leo, you've gone from aiding and "abiding" to aiding and "abidding". For the millionth time, it's abetting. A-B-E-T-T-I-N-G. Keep working at it, sport, we'll have you ready by summer for the fourth-grade spelling bee. You'll probably have to compete by video from the county lockup, but I like your chances.

Just Testing if you're paying attention!

10/23/2010 04:17:07 pm

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics