BRYANT CAVE LLP LAW FIRM, SENIOR PARTNER STEVEN R. SMITH DOES NOT LIKE HOW HE HAS BEEN PORTRAYED ON THIS BLOG

9/23/2010

CHICAGO-(AEAE) ILLIINOIS LAW FIRM BRYANT CAVE LLP, SENIOR PARTNER Steven R. Smith does not like how he has been portrayed on this blog. Steven R. Smith in a filing before Illinois Judge Mary Ann Mason stated that the grounds for complaining consists of “threatening faxes and blog postings on the Internet!”. Although Steven R. Smith does not site to any particular blog posting or faxes in his filing. I asked Mr. Smith today in Judge Mason's court room, "What is your real name?" Smith replied, "Go to sleep!" This morning outside of the Chicago Daley Center Court house there were a thousand people standing. Some one had called in a phony bomb scare. When we were finally let into the Daley Court House Building I went up to the 25th Floor to Judge Mason's court room. I was suprised to find Smith in there. I said to Smith "I was shocked to see you here, I figured that you would not have made it in today." Smith replied, "I figured that you would be in jail by now, for making the phony Bomb telephone call."

SIDE BAR: Madison Avenue executives will tell you that there is no such thing as bad publicity. Before Steven R. Smith was featured here, no one could locate him on the Internet. Now all someone has to do is type Steven R. Smith in any search engine and up pops Smith's name, this photo and plenty of AEAE stories about Smith
. Steven R. Smith should worship the ground the author of the blog walks on for making Steven R. Smith famous, a popular Internet figure. Look at his picture, isn't Mr. Smith handsome?

8 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

LEO THE UNI-Bobbmer

9/22/2010 06:16:29 pm

Leo is the Mad Bomber!

He's used to carpet bombing the courts with frivoulous motions and other pointless litigation.

Reality

9/22/2010 07:43:24 pm

Kind of ironic. The only time Leo doesn't get laughed out of a courtroom is when the building is evacuated and nobody is there. Up yours, Fat Ass.

Leo the litigator

9/22/2010 07:51:38 pm

Smith is setting you up, fool. Another Judge who will give you nothing ecept another sanction, Smith is making sure Mason despises you like all the others/

Your all alone out there Leo. All alone

Lone Ranger

9/23/2010 04:12:43 am

Sent out some missles today...Admissions...don't answer them...you go right to jail... admit that you committed "fraud" on the court.
Admitt that you violated the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct...

Best advice when you receive these admissions just ignore them..

"Hi-Yo Silver Away!"

Tonto

9/23/2010 04:14:21 am

Question. "Why did Kemo Sabe like to work alone?"

Answer. "No witnesses!"

9/23/2010 04:42:48 am

Question? Why was the Lone Ranger called the Lone Ranger?

Because Kemo Sabe liked to work alone-No witnesses!

Leo the Loser

9/23/2010 07:07:34 am

While the Lone Ranger worked alone to avoid having witnesses, Leo works alone because not even Tonto could put up with his body odor. Take a bath loser.

hahahahahahahahahaha

9/23/2010 07:39:11 am

blahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Tonto got mad Leo constantly try
make whoopee with Scout. Tonto
not sleep so good when Scout
whinny and Leo gargle. Tonto
tell Leo this not Tijuana donkey
show.

blahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics