CHARGE BRYAN CAVE LLC RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISIQUALIFY ILLINOIS JUDGE MARY ANN MASON LOADED WITH MISREPRESENTATION OF MATERIAL FACT AND LAW

5/19/2010

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER HAS MOVED “THREE” TIMES FOR THE DISQUALIFICATION OF ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE MARY ANN MASON ON THE GROUNDS THAT SHE IS BIAS AND PREJUDICE AND STOLLER CANNOT GET A “FAIR” TRIAL IN FRONT OF HER. Yesterday Illinois Bryan Cave LLP, attorneys Steven R. Smith and his “bag man” Michael Werich have filed their usually 100+ page response which in Stoller's opinion is pack filled with misrepresentations of material fact and law in violation of Illinois Rules of Professional Misconduct Rule 3.3(a) www.iardc.org Stoller will file an attorney disciplinary complaint against Steven R. Smith and “bag man” Michael Werich alleging fraud, misrepresentations and violations of ARDC Rules 3.3(a) and 8.4
Legal Disclaimer: Smith and Werich are considered innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of professional misconduct.

2 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Leo the Zero

5/17/2010 04:32:13 pm

Fattie keeps making funnies. Fattie thinks he knows what a fact is. Fattie has been banned by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals for perjury. That is a fact. Fattie has been banned twice from appearing in the U.S. District Court. That is a fact. Fattie was referred to the U.S. District attorney for investigation. That is a fact. Fattie went to jail twice last year. That is a fact. Fattie going to go bye-bye again and make boom-boom in his jail cell with a big boy. That is a fact.

An Attorney

5/18/2010 01:08:43 pm

No one will settle with you not even to make you go away, not even for nuisance value. You'll never see a dollar much less 1% of anything.

Sorry Leo but you went to far this time. The Trial courts wont give you a fair hearing. The appellate courts wont pay attention to you, The State Supreme Court hates you and even thinking the Supremems would grant a cert petition is absurd.

So you are screwed and we are going to take you all the way on every case you file. We litigate professionally, you don't have a chance so we are happy to go till the point where the last court speaks as you like to say.

At some point we are going to have you put in prison, then i'ts all over for you. As for us we will still be at the country clubs and the yacht clubs and at our winter homes or summer homes enjoying our families and watching our grand children grow.

Get the message, putz?

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics