DEMOCRATIC SENATORS CONFIRMS KAGAN FOR SUPREME COURT

8/7/2010

WASHINGTON-(AEAE)-By a 63-37 vote the Senate confirmed Kagan to the U.S Supreme Court. 58 Democrats including five Republicans voted for Kagan. Justice Kagan is not expected to shift the court's ideological makeup because she succeeded the liberal justice, John Paul Stevens. Now for the first time there are three women on the U.S. Supreme Court, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor. The Kagan was a polarizing nomination. The out come was preordained in view of the Democratic majority in the Senate. President Obama Introduces New SCOTUS Justice Elena Kagan
It will behoove you to pay attention to this blog which will cover the important cases that the Supreme Court has agreed to hear. VIOLENT VIDEO GAMES -Whether a California law barring the sale and rental of violent video games to minors violates constitution-free speech rights. ANIT-GAY PROTESTS AT MILITARY FUNERALS- Whether constitutional free speech rights protects anti-gay protests by members of a Kansas church at funerals for U.S. Military members killed in Iraq. BUSINESS IMMGRATION LAW IN ARIZONA- Whether business civil rights and immigration groups can succeed in their legal challenge to a Arizona law that punishes employers who knowingly hire illegal immigrants. Keeping tabs on the U.S Supreme Court you can stay right here.
The U.S Supreme Court is also considering three Stoller Petitions for Writ of Cert this up coming term. Leo Stoller is an expert on U.S. Supreme Court practice. The model of AEAE is clearly, “Until the last court speaks!”

SIDEBAR- I filed an appeal with the Illinois Appellate Court Second Division. A clerk in returning a stamped copy of my notice of appeal she wrote, “The court does not have jurisdiction, there is no 304 language!”
I wanted to write her back or call her to inform her that the only way I can get to the High Court is for me to go through them. Let them find that that the Illinois Appellate court had not jurisdiction because some trial court judge did not allow 304 language, what a joke that is. We will see what the Illinois Supreme Court says about that and what the U.S. Supreme Court says about the Illinois Appellate court violating the due process rights of a Appellant because some trial court did not include 304 language in a final order. For the record it costs about a million dollars to get to the U.S. Supreme. 99% of all lawyers in America do not have the skill level to file a Appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court. Stoller has been there 25 times and counting. http://www.filefront.com/17177730/July-30-2010-Supreme-Court-Order0001.jpg/
http://www.filefront.com/17149297/Supreme http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-119.htm
For the students of law remember it is not so important what any trial court judge rules, they violate the constitutional rights of the parties in front of them each time they open their mouths, the important thing to remember is always to make your record for appeal.

11 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Paper and Post its

8/6/2010 04:07:59 pm

One think is sure, win or lose, I have the skill set to sue you into oblivion. And I have the rest of my life to do it!

Leo SUXXX it

8/6/2010 05:21:50 pm

99% of all lawyers in America haven't been sanctioned and barred by the upper level district courts. 99% of all lawyers in America haven't been jailed for contempt of court and held on a psychiatric evaluation. 99% of all lawyers in America haven't declared bankrupty when the party they are suing countersues them back. 99% of all lawyers in America haven't been declared as a vexatious litigant.

Congratulations, Leo. You've done what 99% of all lawyers in America haven't been able to do. Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.

Circus Midget Leo

8/6/2010 06:07:01 pm

Yes, Leo, you have the last few remaining years of your pathetic life to reinforce what everyone already knows. You wasted your whole life being a wannabe con artist and the courts, judges, real lawyers, your family, all know you are no better than a derelect who gets busted shoplifting (in your case, probably women's makeup) at the local Wal-Mart. Just keep kidding yourself, Fat Boy. You don't have the "skill set" to carry a real lawyer's briefcase, not to mention the skills to prevail in anything. Have fun dying broke, alone, despised by your own family, and a lifelong failure. You did it to yourself.

skum

8/6/2010 10:29:08 pm

and remember skum: you are not a lawyer. the pleadings you file for the most part are copied from a real lawyers work

you have no skillsets other then failure

BIZARRO

8/7/2010 04:48:46 am

Great arugment, spoken like a real pro. You can tell that to the Appellate court(s) and see how far that gets you, tough guy or the Supreme Court. Just say he pleadings are just "copies" of some other lawyer(s) work and our not tob be taken seriously because the U.S. Court System is really nothing more than a "club" for "real" lawyers and everyone else is barred from the court hourse, unless you're a member of this exclusive club of people who took a bar exam.
Sounds like a great professionally written brief by a brilliant "real" lawyer!
Who will be forced to spend a precious million dollars in "time" responding to pleadings that no doubt are just copies of "real" lawyers winning case briefs and were just re-used in order to not re-invent the wheel from a similar "winning" case by a dim wit who just knows a little secret of law, "always do your legal research and copy those "winning" briefs from American "best" attorneys!

Leo the Zero

8/7/2010 01:41:46 pm

"Bizarro" is Fat Boy Leo trying to sound intelligent, of course. Same old stuff-- he says he's going to win this, win that, do this, do that. The result is always the same. He gets laughed at by the courts, attorneys, court staff, and anyone familiar with him at all. Too bad for you, Leo. You have wasted your entire life being a complete fraud. Take a look around your little rathole, Fattie. This is as good as it gets for you. And you have nobody to blame but yourself.

The Bar Exam

8/7/2010 02:36:07 pm

Thats right needledick it is an exclusive club who took that exam and passed. YOU ARE NOT AND NEVER WILL BE A MEMBER OF THAT EXCLUSIVE CLUB

You flunked out. You couldn't cut the mustard, climb the hill or make the grade. You gave up, you quit and you hate all of us who have the license you always thought you deserved.

In truth and in fact you would have been a lousy lawyer, your not smart enough.

P.S. I fucked her tonight before work

Bummer

8/7/2010 03:11:42 pm

That kind of kills the mood. I was going to do her after work.

8/7/2010 04:45:06 pm

He Doesn't have to "win" anything. He wins by making his oponents pay millions and millions of dollars to win. By some estimates his opponents have spend over 100 millions to win to date and will spend over 100 million more dollars before he done, to win! _uck You!

Reality

8/8/2010 03:26:16 pm

Which is why you either spent your whole legal "career" either in the process of getting banned by the courts or getting banned, dumbass. Because you have no clue, your only purpose was try to shake people down and, the justice system may be slow, but it caught up to you, you sawed-off little dwarf. Now you have nothing, except a piece of crap rathole to live in, the alienation of your entire family, a partner-in-crime brother who will probably keel over dead in jail, and over a million dollars in non-dischargeable judgments against you.

Well done, idiot. Way to waste your life. Go ahead and keep filing-- the only certainty is that you are so stupid everything you do puts you one step closer to joining your brother in the slammer.

P.S. She's a great gal. And thank God your children will have a chance to live fulfilling, meaningful lives without the continued emotional baggage of a lossr con artist father. Up yours, dickless.

Your friend

8/13/2010 02:26:15 pm

My name is BIZARRO, what is your name?
The Clerk of the Court would like to know. Sooner or later the Clerk will know!

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics