Facebook IPO Casino Capitalism at its “Best”, is a 'Bad' bet!

2/6/2012

Mark Zuckerberg

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-”INVESTORS HAVE BEEN eagerly WAITING THE OPPORTUNITY TO THROW THEIR MONEY AT THE INITIAL STOCK OFFERING (IPO) OF FACEBOOK THIS WEEK. Facebook, the creator of another “Social Network Site ” is only a “nine” year old fade Internet sensation that has attracted a whopping 850 million 'free' users who like to engage in 'social media' on line. Facebook IPO this week will make a very 'few' people richer than their wildest dreams, make more people poorer and eventuality wipe out the fortunes of millions, when the 'Facebook Internet Social Media fade fades' i.e the 1999 collapse of the previous Internet 'darling' Companies all imploded at the same time. “The most astounding thing about the previous 1999 Dot-com bubble was the obscene amount of money spent on IPO's of other Internet Companies. Then like now there will be many “Zealous venture capitalists” who will fall over themselves to invest millions in FaceBook; a another Dot-com with an unproven, unsustainable business model. Facebook is executing a massive IPOs this week which will no doubt generate sky-high stock prices and profits for the original owners of the stock. One does not have to be a financial fortune teller to predict what is going to happen if past is prologue . We all know what eventually will happened to the value of the other once popular social network site Myspace the most visited social networking site in 2005. The IPOthis week is a classic illustration of “Casino Capitalism”. Facebook initial investors are rushing to the well to collect before Facebook goes the way enevitable way that Myspace went.” stated Professor of Economics Harold Goldenshalf. “Please continue reading about the previous Top 10 dot-com flops before you throw your money away on the Facebook IPO,”
By Leo Stoller View this Author's Spotlight

.

5 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Your Horoscope for Monday Feburary 6, 2012

2/5/2012 12:00:28 am

Although the sun is setting on your sign, it appears that you have a real “bright” future. You will owe only owe an additional 50 grand this year and that amount should only increase about 10% each year, adjusted for inflation, there after indefinitely. The good news is that you will find someone to share you debts with you, which will make your financial obligations less burdensome, until that person too, is driven away, screaming, “get away from me you hyper!”

she found him he's happy with her debts and going to deal with u

2/5/2012 05:49:42 am

Horoscope

2/5/2012 10:00:50 am

MERCURY IS IN YOUR SIGN. WHAT JOY YOU HAD BY PAYING ON TIME LAST MONTH HAS EXPIRED. PLEASE WRITE THOSE CHECKS, THE FIRST OF THE MONTH HAS ALREADY PASSED 6 DAYS AGO AND YOUR CREDITORS ARE GETTING RESTLESS....

Vito

2/7/2012 08:32:28 am

The contract has been issued fat boy

Hey Vito

2/7/2012 03:25:56 pm

Why don't you just kick in $25-50 grand, that nothing to you and should last about 5 or 6 weeks...

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics