FIND OUT WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEBT CEILING CRISIS OF 2011

8/1/2011

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-IT APPEARS THAT A SETTLEMENT OVER THE DEBT CEILING CRISIS MAY HAVE BEEN REACHED AS BETWEEN THE REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATICS LEGISLATORS AT THE 11TH HOUR. But who is responsible for debt ceiling crisis in the first place which has terrorized the entire nation? Many have pointed the finger at Democratic President Barack Obama, Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D. Nev.). Or even Democratic Treasry Secretary Tim Geithner (after all who would find a Treasury Secretary named "Tim" to be credible.) Many have pointed to Republican Speaker of the House, John Boehner, as being unreasonable. Senate Minority Leader Republican Mitch McConnell has also taken some heat. Democratic Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi was also named as a possible person responsible.
A report just out of Washington D.C. a few minutes ago finds the "stupid" democratic voters as the culprids. For it is the "stupid" voters that voted for Democratic President Barack Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi. Remember the Democratics could have at any time voted to increase and pass a increase on the debt limit during the 2008 to 2010 term in Congress when they controlled the House and Senate without any resistance from the Republicans, which would clearly have averted this curent debt ceiling crisis. However the democratics, President Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi miscalculated by deferring to vote on raising the debt deiling when the democrats controlled both the House and Senate during the 2008-2010 Term. In order to be able to blame the Republicans for their failure to raise the debt ceiling in 2011, causing a "crash" of the American economy, in order to assist the Democratics to take back the House, hold on to the Presidency in 2010. Consequently the only proper party to blame for the current debt ceiling crisis is the "stupid" democratic voters who voted for "change" in 2008, putting Obama, Reid and Pelosi in Office, according to a Washington insider. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43949638/ns/politics-capitol_hill/?gt1=43001

1 Comment

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Smart Person

8/8/2011 05:35:11 am

I must be one of those who are considered smart, since by default, meaning I voted for McCain and Allice in Wonderland, making me a smart person?
I reasoned that if I had voted Democratic, and it was the stupid Democrates that are to blame for the election of Obama, rather than voting for Mr Grumpy McCain and his running mate "I can see Russia from my front door" Palin, as I did, I am by deduction using you analysis, I am undoubtedly a smart voter. Thanks. I would have come to a different conclusion and actually do differ with your reasoning. I think Bush is the dumbass and the cause of the recession and the massive debt we are now stuck with due to his terrible leadership. Two wars, unpaid for perscription drug bill, and the main reason for our bills not being paid was the tax break for the wealthly. The single reason we are now facing such a massive 14 plus trillion debt, not to mention the unfunded liability staring us in the future. The Tea Party is the reason we were downgraded. They did not believe default was such an ugyly word and expressed to the world we will default if we don't get our way. Good luck in getting your message out. Republicans deserve the Tea Party, its the best friend the Democrates ever had.

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics