GOOGLE INC., MOVES IN STOLLER RICO CASE TO ENTER PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS CENTRAL MFG AND STEALTH INC

10/6/2009

Michael T. Zeller

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-GOOGLE INC'S ATTORNEY MICHAEL T. ZELLER FILES FOR A PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS CONETRAL MFG INC., AND STEALTH INDUSTRIES INC., IN STOLLER CIVIL RICO ACTION BEFORE ILLINOIS DISTRICT COURT JUDGE VIRGINIA KENDELL. Zeller bases his Motion for a Permanent Injunction and final judgment on an agreement with attorney Lance G. Johnson www.roylance.com . Zeller asserts that Lance G. Johnson the sole member of a "sham" entity that never bought or sold anything and was set up to participate in a "fraudulent" bankruptcy auction sale according to charges contained in Stoller Position Paper filed in the same case according to a court order of Judge Kendell. The fraudulent bankruptcy assignment that Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel drafted according to Stoller's pleading is a "naked" license and/or a "license in gross" that under the Lanham Act transferred "no" valid trademark assets to Lance G. Johnson. Now the issue of Zeller, Fogel and Lance G. Johnson alleged "fraud" on Illinois Bankruptcy Judge Jack Schmetterer is squarely before Illinois District Court Judge Kendell a former prosecutor who is well equiped to make a fair and impartial decision in the Tradmark Case of the 21st Century. Stoller attempted to cancel the term "google" which is now and has been for years in the "dictionary" is descriptive and no longer is entitled to Federal Trademark Protection. Of Course Google Inc., took offense at the "nerve" of Stoller attempting to "cancel" their precious "generic" trademark and filed a Civil Rico
Action against first Stoller and then against only Stoller's companies. Having "cut" an inside deal with Illinois
Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel to accept a "default" judgment against Stoller's companies. Stoller moved to intervene in the Rico Action when it became obvious that Illinois BAnkruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel breached his fudiciary duty to Stoller's Estate. Judge Kendell entered judgment against Stoller's companies. Stoller won an Appeal before the Seventh Circuit. The case was sent back to Judge Kendell where now sits. Judge Kendell finally has the opportunity to expose Zeller, Fogel and Lance G. Johnson for the "frauds" they are according to Stoller's charges in his pleadings filed before Judge Kendell. Stay tuned. For those who have Pacer the Illinois District Court Case No. 07 CV 385

5 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Rita

10/5/2009 03:01:17 pm

I know that Illinois District Court Judge Virginia Kendell is a tough judge my law professor in Intellectual Property has our class watching this Google Inc., trademark case, for he said a long time ago that the Google Trademark is "generic" and should be canceled!

Otis Winkler

10/5/2009 09:13:50 pm

My law professor "told" me that STOLLER is generic for a frivelous lawsuit "or" legal proceeding that waists everyones time, as in "you've been stollered."

Law Professor

10/6/2009 12:29:57 am

Rita, no wonder I had to flunk you. What I said in my lecture was the Leo Stoller is a lying idiot lacking the slightest modicum of decency.

Mimi

10/6/2009 02:52:00 am

Leo, I mean Rita, your grasp of trademark law is obviously nonexistent. Trademarks aren't cancelled, registrations are.

Perry Mason

10/6/2009 10:44:19 am

I do not see any chance of Leo prevailing.

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics