GORDON AND REES LAW FIRM MAKE PHONY THREAT TO SUE STOLLER FOR DEFAMATION

11/5/2009

The 'Big' Boss

GORDON AND REES MAKES EMPTY THREAT TO SUE STOLLER FOR DEFAMATION

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ON OCTOBER 29, 2009 the law firm of Gordon and Rees http://www.gordonrees.com/ made certain serious allegations regarding Stoller's free speech rights which appear to be empty threats. Gordon and Rees appear to have come to the conclusion that Stoller's allegations of “Criminal Contempt” against their firm may be “factually and legally accurate” . Gordon and Rees have not sued Stoller as of this date and Stoller has not received an summons. One Oct. 29, 2009 Gordon and Rees sent a threatening letter to Stoller stating that"recent statements on your website go well beyond protected free speech. Examples of your false and misleading statements include: Gordon & Rees LLP, Ryan T. Brown, Chance L. Cooper and J. Haynes Ryan have been charged with criminal contempt and Judge Kathy Flanagan granted Stoller's request to file indirect criminal contempt felony charges against the law firm of Gordon & Rees LLP, Ryan t. Brown, Hayes Ryan and Chance L. Cooper." "These statements, which are factually and legally inaccurate, may mislead the public into believing that criminal charges have been filed against the firm and/or named attorneys buy a policing agency. In this connection, your statements have caused and continue to cause, serious irreparable injury to this firm's reputation and the reputation of the individual attorneys named." Is it possible that Gordon and Rees were bluffing?

7 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships available
312-545-4554

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Dick Johnson

11/4/2009 02:49:36 pm

Does good old Stuart M. Gordon look like the kind of guy that wants to sue Stoller? I don't think he got the balls!

Chip

11/4/2009 09:28:16 pm

Stollerexposed.blog.com

Hondo

11/4/2009 11:42:50 pm

The thing is, he can sue Leo and likely get a judgment. The problem is how does he collect? You can't get water out of a rock. Then again, just how well hidden are Leo's assets? Remember one thing Leo, no matter how smart you are or think you are, there is always someone smarter. I good investigator can and will find everything you have.

Dave Stone

11/5/2009 03:00:23 am

Chip you can do better than that...or maybe you can't...either way "what comes around goes around...for you have treated others as they will now treat you...think not the "worst" is yet to come....O by the way I know a lot of "good" investigators end up being reported to the Attorney General, become defendants in Civil lawsuits and go to jail...Please bring on the "good" investigators...so that his "next" investigation will be his last, according to a report from the New York Times

Johnny Dangerous

11/5/2009 03:53:45 am

"Bring it on"? A certain president sure regretted saying that. The Stoller exposed website is certainly an interesting read. Chili Palmer has Stoller dead in his sights. I'll note Stoller has not even attempted to refute anything on it.

As far as someone actually being "charged", Stoller doesn't seem the difference between filing a legal pleading accusing someone and an actual criminal complaint. Two very different things in the legal world. Either he doesn't understand or he is deliberately misstating the facts. Which one is it Stoller?

Professor

11/5/2009 03:52:33 pm

The Court will decide. I have personally seen Judges lock up people based upon a complaint filed by a complainant.... Every great general in history held the position that "your either with me or against me!" You are either my enemy or my friend there is "no" in between ergo the charges against the well known Chip Douglass...Chili Peper who?

adidas shoes outlet link

6/7/2010 03:34:08 pm

Hhe article's content rich variety which make us move for our mood after reading this article. surprise, here you will find what you want! Recently, I found some wedsites which commodity is colorful of fashion. Such as www.sec-torand.com that worth you to see. Believe me these websites won’t let you down.

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics