GREG KELLY PRESIDENT OF SEIU UNION MUST BE REMOVED AS PRESIDENT

3/19/2022

Chicago (AEAE)-Greg Kelley the president of SEIU Healthcare Illinois Indiana Missouri & Kansas, which represents 90,000 healthcare, child care, nursing home and home healthcare workers across the fourstates. He is the first African American to head SEIU HCIIMK, the fastest-growing local union in the Midwest and its time for Greg Kelly to be withdrawn as President of SEIU. Kelly is not what he appears to be. Kelly is rated in the opinion of AEAE as unqualified

A Petition is being filed with the SEIU Healthcare UNION to remove Greg Kelly as President. Although Greg Kelly falsely claims to “give a voice to the working people, lift wages, improve workplace conditions for working people, bring dignity and respect to his members in their communities and their places of employment, and fight for racial and economic justice. “

The real Greg Kelly, in the opinion of AEAE, is nothing more than the classic greedy union boss, that now happens to be the first black SEIU president, that appears to care only to line his pockets with the union dues of SEIU members and ignore the plight of the SEIU Members allowing the IDHS to victimize SEIU members.
For instance Greg Kelly was forewarned of a union members plight see attached letter to Kelly. Kelly did absolutely nothing after receiving the letter and talking to the Union member,
The SEIU Obtain a arbitration award from a grievance filed by the SEIU home health care worker, a union member awarding him 304.75 hours of monthly service hours of work. The award also stating that Illinois Department of Human Services “would not be retaliated against”. See Attached.
Nonetheless HSP Policy Unit sent letters to the health care worker stating that he could not work in excess of 60 hours a week (240 per month) which represents retaliation against a binding arbitration resolution on 11-27-2020 which order stated that he could work 304.75 hours a month, which is in excess of 60 per month.

The Health Care Worker filed a second grievance; a hearing was held on March 1, 2022. IDHS, according to the Union Contract failed to respond in fourteen days. The SEIUNION, under big talker, defender of the rights of Union members Greg Kelly failed and refused to default IDHS, pursuant to the terms of Union Contract.See attached documents.

A petition is being circulated to UNION members to recall Greg Kelly, the first Black President of SEIU, who is not what he represents, what he pretends to be, and must be removed form his office.

SEIU needs a President that will fight for its Union Members against IDHS , when IDHS chooses to victimize SEIU members. Not a President , like Greg Kelly, that just grows fat on the Union dues of SEIU members. Greg Kelly must go.

If any party has any other information about Greg Kelly that they would like to share, please email [email protected]

Legal Disclosure: Greg Kelly denies the allegations contained herein. Greg Kelly is considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law

griveance_complaint-min.pdf
File Size:	6608 kb
File Type:	pdf

Download File

exhibit_3_11-27-20_seiu_decision.pdf
File Size:	108 kb
File Type:	pdf

Download File

letter_nov_16_2921.pdf
File Size:	183 kb
File Type:	pdf

Download File

0 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics