HAYNES RYAN REFUSES TO WAIVE SERVICE OF SUMMONS IN OPEN COURT

12/4/2009

Ryan refuses summons

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-HAYNES RYAN THE YOUNGEST ATTORNEY FROM THE ILLINOIS OFFICE OF GORDON AND REES ON FRIDAY IN FRONT OF ILLINOIS JUDGE DANIEL T. GILLESPIE REFUSED TO ACCEPT SERVICE OF PROCESS on behalf of his partners and clients Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman. Stoller asked Judge Gillespie if he could address Mr. Ryan and request in open court if Mr. Ryan would waive service of summons. Stoller then extended the summons to Mr. Ryan who than broke out in a Tibetan chant asserting in front of Judge Gillespie all of the reasons why he refused to accept the “criminal” contempt summons. Mr. Ryan did waive service of summons for his own service so that if Gordon and Rees had to sacrifice just one of their 300 attorneys to save the rest, Mr. Haynes Ryan was chosen to become the sacrificial lamb.

The Seventh Circuit issued a sanction against Stoller today in a dispute out of a paupers petition that had been filed. Stoller will take that issue to the U.S. Supreme Court for their opinion.

10 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Bilbo

12/4/2009 03:34:54 pm

Why would a firm like Gordon and Rees refuse to accept service of process in front of a judge? Doesn't that look funny? Please explain

Mike Hunt

12/4/2009 11:46:00 pm

On December 4, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ordered that the Special Master’s report regarding Leo Stoller’s truthfulness be forwarded to the United States Attorney for consideration of whether Leo Stoller should be prosecuted for perjury. The Court of Appeals also ordered the Mack bar against Leo Stoller to be reinstated, directing the clerks in all federal courts within the 7th Circuit not to accept any papers submitted by Stoller. The court entered the orders after establishing Stoller had been deceitful.

The court documents are available at http://www.scribd.com/ChiliPalmer75.

Anon

12/5/2009 01:48:14 am

The Bell Tolls for Thee link

12/5/2009 04:28:17 am

Isn't it about time for you to put that masters degree in theater to work for you by faking heart attacks in order to avoid court appearances? Or perhaps by playing the cuckoo defense that your brother tried. Maybe you should start riding that bicycle of yours down the street naked and clucking like a chicken.

Hondo

12/5/2009 06:17:39 am

Leo has abused the legal system for too long. Now the system is going to get some pay back. Leo, does it bug you that no one has any respect for you as a person? How does one get to be so vile?

Gandalf

12/5/2009 10:10:35 am

I like vile...movies wouldn't be any fun without "vile"... hay I have a proposal that involves the certainty of death,
Small Chance at Success, having more fun than you ever had,
What are you waiting for?

12/5/2009 10:39:24 am

More prison for Stoller. Adios, Leo. Make sure you pack plenty of KY jelly.

Sarman

12/5/2009 01:53:41 pm

A good reputation is something that he has "never" been burdened with.

The Warden

12/6/2009 07:16:21 am

Right on, Anon. Leo might have finally found a use for his big mouth-- oh, excuse me, there will be plenty of people in prison who find his big mouth useful for something.

12/6/2009 11:44:31 am

Don't drop the soap, slick.

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics