HEARING BEFORE ILLINOIS DISTRICT COURT JUDGE VIRGINIA KENDELL SET FOR TUESDAY IN THE “FRIVILIOUS” RICO ACTION AGAINST STOLLER

10/11/2009

ATTORNEYS MICHAEL T. ZELLER AND LANCE G. JOHNSON CHARGED WITH FRAUD

Michael T. Zeller Esq

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-SUNDAY-OCT. 11 2009-FIRE WORKS ARE SET TO GO OFF IN THE “FRIVILIOUS” GOOGLE INC., CIVIL RICO ACTION INVOLVING STOLLER'S COMPANIES ON TUESDAY. GOOGLE INC., IS SEEKING A PERMINATE INJUNCTION. STOLLER has fired back with “fraud” charges against Google Inc.'s famous trademark attorney Michael T. Zeller, his buddy, Lance G. Johnson and his crowd. People who are following this story are aware that Stoller has won the first round of this case before the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The case has been sent back to Judge Kendell. Michael T. Zeller Esq., and his buddy Lance G. Johnson have attempted to perpetrate a “fraud” on the Federal Court by submitting a “agreed” final judgment. The previous “agreed” judgment that was cut by Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel was vacated by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Google Inc., does not want to litigate their “frivolous” Rico action for fear they are going to be hit with a counter claim that could put them out of business. Remember Google Inc.,' mantra is “do no Evil”. Stoller according to charges in his counter claim that will be filed asserts that Google Inc., has themselves engaged in Racketeering, fraud, conspiracy, misrepresentation and should be liable for 100 billion an amount of money commensurate with their ability to “pay” and to have the court punish them for an “on going” fraud on the court. Google Inc., has a “short” memory. The Federal Court was successful in putting one of the world's largest accounting firms Arther Anderson out of business as a result of perceived “wrong doing”. Google Inc., is no exception. Google Inc., is nothing more than a modern day Titanic headed for the Ice berg and their attorney Michael T. Zeller is steering them right into the Ice Berg. Stay tuned to see the crash!
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed here are those of Leo Stoller and GOOGLE INC, Michael T. Zeller, Richard M. Fogel and Lance G. Johnson are considered innocent of all charges until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

2 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Juan

10/10/2009 04:00:21 pm

Attorneys Michael T. Zeller and Lance G. Johnson charged with FRAUD, what did they do? Who did they defraud?

Leo the Lion

10/12/2009 03:28:15 pm

Leo, I mean Juan, "charged" here means that it has been fabricated by Leo himself and his fake AEAE organization designed to smear lawyers. The Leo Stoller Truth Serum blog (http://stollerexposed.blog.com) has put it best in explaining what this fraudulent organization is, along with highlighting that both Leo and his brother (who is supposed director of another, equally bogus organization designed to smear judges) have spent plenty of time in the slammer for their misdeeds:

Well, there is a certain sense of perverted logic behind it. After all, Leo Stoller has always felt the need to represent himself to the public as an ‘expert’ in one form or another.

Of course, a great place to start is Leo Stoller’s representation that he is the ‘Executive Director’ of the ‘Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE), the purpose of which is supposedly ‘the strict enforcement of ethics among lawyers, judges and businessmen.’

That one worked has worked out well for Leo Stoller. He represents himself as a ‘legal ethics expert,’ despite seemingly-endless court opinions that address his penchant for frivolous lawsuits, misrepresentations, perjury, forgery, and a laundry list of sordid and unscrupulous behavior that is, well, the antithesis of all things remotely associated with the enforcement of ethical behavior.

And then there is Leo Stoller’s insistence that he is the “Nation’s Leading Trademark Expert,” but to be fair, Leo Stoller has never stated what nation or what planet to which he is referring. Despite the Trademark and Trial Board of the United States Patent Office being on record ad nauseum as describing Leo Stoller’s trademark antics as nothing more than serial attempts to harvest ill-gotten gains, or the United States District Court of the Northern District of Illinois noting, in not so many words, that Leo Stoller’s habitually ridiculous filings must be restrained, Stoller continues to represent himself to the public as a “trademark expert.”

Oh, yes, and then there is Leo Stoller the Constitutional Law expert or, to be more precise, Leo Stoller the freedom of speech expert. This has also worked out particularly well for Leo Stoller, as he continued to publish vicious and maligning material about the opposite party in a civil proceeding and found himself locked up– not once, but twice– in the Cook County Jail (year to date, of course). To be fair, Leo Stoller has applied the same depth of understanding of the First Amendment as he has to his assertions that he is an intellectual property expert. The same– but equally devoid.

And, of course, there is (or was) the organization called the ‘Americans for the Enforcement of Judicial Ethics,’ which appeared to be an offshoot of the lurid ‘Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics.’ Using the same charade of being a crusader against the corrupt and evil, Leo Stoller employed his strict vetting process and ethical abyss to appoint his brother, Christopher Stoller, as the ‘Executive Director’ of that sham. Christopher Stoller is now serving out a prison sentence in Arizona, but all things being equal, Christopher Stoller may have surmounted his brother’s standard of living, whereas Leo averred in a recent court document that he was subsisting on food stamps and social security.

So, naturally it follows that Leo Stoller would try once again to eke out a buck or two by marketing an organization to the masses that he represents as being in the righteous pursuit of truth and justice. And for only $25.00 per person annually, $100.00 per business annually, or the bargain-basement-price of $250.00 per year as a corporate sponsor, you too can hook yourself to the wagontrain of misrepresentation known as Leo Stoller.

There are, you guessed it, a few variations on Leo Stoller’s most recent attempts to make money on ineptitude marketed as legal genius. The contact name is ‘L. Stollen,’ but that could easily be attributed to the fact that– to borrow the wit of former Dallas Cowboy linebacker Thomas Henderson– Leo Stoller’s grasp of spelling leaves one to wonder if he could spell ‘cat’ after being spotted a ‘c’ and a ’t.’ Maybe this ineptitude has spilled over into his ability to spell his own name. Or maybe it is yet another devious attempt to fly under the radar long enough to get a little cash in his pocket, or maybe part of a scheme to outrun his myriad of creditors.

Or maybe it is simply the case of a legitimate organization that, for whatever reason, is blind to Leo Stoller’s vast history of judicial abuse and ethical misconduct. Who knows-Leo Stoller espousing the law has alw

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics