HEARING SET FOR TODAY BEFORE JUDGE DUDGEON ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERTION AND INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT CHARGE

11/2/2009

CORRUPTION DOES NOT PAY

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-TODAY ILLINOIS DUPAGE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE THOMAS DUDGEON WILL HEAR RAYMOND WEBER'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND STOLLER REQUEST FOR INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION. On July 9, 2009, while Stoller was in the custody of the Cook County Department of Corrections for the "crime" of publishing articles on Stoller's former blog rentamark.blog.com, Raymond Weber received an ex parte judgment against Stoller for $16,000. The surety company paid Weber in August of 2009. Despite the fact that Stoller has appealed the July 9, 2009 ex parte judgment. Nowwithstanding, Weber moved to get an additional $35,000 judgment against Stoller and the Surety Company believing that the Surety company was an easy "mark" according to charges by Stoller in his Indirect Criminal Contempt Petition see article below. Today Raymond H. Weber a convicted felon, will ask Judge Dudgeon to give him $35,000 more and Stoller will press Judge Dudgeon to grant Stoller's request for an Indirect Criminal Contempt hearing charging Weber his wife and their attorneys Laura Myers and Eliot Abarbanel, Prairie State Legal Services Inc., with perjury and false swearing by a witness 720 ILCS 5/32-2(a) a Class 3 felony see People v. Hagopian, 343 Ill App 640, 99 N.E 2d 726 (1st Dist 1951) asking for a sentense of 3-5 years of jail time. Stay stuned..
Legal Disclaimer: Raymond Weber, Lesia Weber, Laura Myers, Eliot Abarbanel and Prairie State Legal Services Inc are considered innocient until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt at trial.

13 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Liz Davis

11/1/2009 11:18:03 am

I hat bugs....

Joe

11/1/2009 11:32:28 am

You see Chip, read my lips, read this blog and you will see exactly what is being foreshodowed for you "tough" guy, since you have become one of them, you are going to be treated just like "one" of them ZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzz "BANG"! When the process server tags you, your parents and your attorneys......

Chip Douglas

11/1/2009 12:26:17 pm

Yeah, you are a real tough guy when it comes to bullying old people. A legend in your own shower.

11/1/2009 01:59:16 pm

You had years to settle...you now have pushed this case to the max, their all going be charged with felonies, which I have evidence that you all have committed.... The only thing that prevented that from happening thus far was my misguided belief that you and them would "never" have done what you have done... Secondly, you have allowed this to go so long, but since I am convinced that you are "never" coming to the table, and your co-conspirators have encourged you not to come to the table, to resolve this matter amicable, you can spend what ever funds you and they have left to hire good "criminal" attorneys because the ones you have now, are going to be defendants and they will not be able to help you..any "moran" can read the blog and figure out what is going to happen to them if they violate the law....You were warned....and no one will visit you either when you're locked up....please pass the soap and shampoo I need it tonight for my shower....

Ralph Retunza

11/2/2009 03:52:58 am

I thought Ray Weber was one of your cronies, Leo. Didn't he uesd to help you make fake documents and sales invoices? How come you had a faling out? Was Ray getting to big for his breaches?

SOJOURNER

11/2/2009 07:05:45 pm

Oh and, by the way, that last comment under Ralph must not be hi-lited in blue cause I'm thinking you got into a computer before you left court yesterday morning.

Hondo Lane

11/2/2009 09:11:01 pm

Sroller's ex is a fine lady and mother. She does not deserve to be treated this way.

Stoller has come to the realization of what a fine lady he has lost and is throwing a tantrum because he cannot have his way.

11/2/2009 11:59:11 pm

I am not Leo. Far from it. If I was Leo wouldn't this be posted in blue? I just mixed up Ray Weber and that guy Marculis. What ever hapened to him?

Ray Weber

11/3/2009 03:12:00 am

Leo was my legal guardian...now he is charging me with perjury and is trying to get me locked up for 3-5 years, can anyone help me? Elizebeth Davis were are you?

Loyola friend of the ex

11/3/2009 03:19:38 am

Stoller should not be threatening to have his ex-wife locked up, she is a good nurse who takes care of sick babies, who would take care of the sick babies if she was put in jail? I come to this blog every day and it makes me "sick!" that such a person can delight in doing what he does...I can't waite to see what he does tonight..

Chip

11/3/2009 09:32:34 am

Stollerexposed.blog.com

Shawn

11/3/2009 10:11:07 am

Why do you keep provoking him...you remind of the Vietnam Prisoner in Platoon who kept getting up to agravate the American soldier until....

WARLOCK

11/3/2009 02:21:48 pm

Prediction:I can see in my crystal ball a very sad picture of Chiperooonia losing everything, family, friends, credit, job everything....Let me look a little closer...hmmm... I don't see it happening today or tomorrow but I clearly see it happening, Oooo, sooner than expected, for there are those who work 24/7 to expose it's evil, criminal acts that have been committed against the innocient, the Chiperooonie was clearly worned, but ignored the wornings and continued to extend its evil beyond anything that could ever have been imagioned...... what comes around goes around, what we plant so shall we reap...

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics