CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE U.S SUPREME COURT HAS re-affirmation of the principle that absolute immunity is not available for everything that a prosecutor does, and indeed is applied sparingly when it is not necessary to serve the public interest. A former grand juror, Peter Atherton, alleged in a complaint that he was removed from a grand jury for asking too many questions. Atherton filed suit pro se against assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Zachem, and others, in 2004. The high court on May 17, 2010 rejected without comment the prosecutor's petition for certiorari, which said the case presents an important issue of prosecutorial immunity. Most immunity cases involve a criminal defendant suing a prosecutor. In this case, a grand juror who was kicked off of a panel is suing a prosecutor. This story continues Supreme Court Won't Stop Dismissed Juror's Suit Against Federal Prosecutor
5 Comments
The Truth
5/20/2010 07:45:55 am
Here you weren't even allowed to talk in Lake County this morning and the judge knows you are scum.
Reply
Fuel the Fire
5/20/2010 08:00:13 am
Again you were mis in formed. Judge gave a briefing schedule. The other side will spend over $250,000 + in time and efford, through appeals prosecuting this case. Every decision will be appealed to the highest court and it gives us another venue to drain the resourses of our opponent. Right now we got them in four seperate actions, which will "never" end for them. So we will see who "ass" was handed to whom. The suckers went for the bate, just like we planed. They will eventually be tied up in court appearences each week so they will not have time for anything else!
Reply
hahahahaha
5/20/2010 03:12:02 pm
blahahahahahahaha you always were the brilliant strategist, Leo blahahahahahaha lose every case and motion you ever brought then rely on your "expert" appellate skills blahahahahaha stop it, fat boy, you're killing us blahahahahaha have fun paying off that million-plus in judgments against you that are a result of your superior legal skills blahaha
Reply
6/7/2010 06:39:03 pm
I am quite agreen with the write's says about the experiencial knowledge of better living.For home improvement I have glance those sits.I found they benifit for life. I want to buy something to home use. Hope you give me a good views
Reply
6/10/2010 06:21:38 pm
Unique design and the item of material is few. Looking at these things, really want to take it home. After reading the post I am to design a room of my own according to the post .On the other hand I also saw some websites, such as let me harvest a lot. Hurry to see!
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
|