HUSBAND HAS RIGHT TO GATHER EVIDENCE AGAINST HIS WIFE DISPITE ORDER OF PROTECTION

2/2/2010

NEW YORK-(AEAE)-A HUSBAND OR EX-HUSBAND HAS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO GATHER EVIDENCE against a former wife in a civil proceeding despite the fact that the woman has a order of protection against the husband. The man can have the wife followed and keep her home under surveillance 24/7 in order obtain evidence against her according to a New York Judge. According to the New York Law Journal a man who hired a detective to trail his wife to a motel where she was having an affair with a local priest was not stalking her, a New York judge has ruled. Forced to resign after her husband turned over a recording of her and the priest to the church where she worked, the wife accused her husband of violating an order of protection requiring him to stay away from her home and place of employment. But the judge held that the husband had the right to gather evidence to defend himself in a divorce proceeding. Click on the attached link to read the full story: Snooping by Detective 'Legitimate' Part of Divorce Process, Judge Finds

9 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Showtime

2/2/2010 02:03:52 am

The whole world is a stage and you are staring in your "own" movie and it is being recorded each day 24/7

Full Disclosure

2/2/2010 04:54:28 am

There are miniature remote camers placed in and around the abode, there are GPS device(s) in your car and you have been under lawful survelance and will be under constant survelance forever. So keep those shades drawn, especially the one with the whole in it

fed watcher

2/2/2010 06:38:44 am

Gee Leo, do you really think we are intimidated? No its just something more the US Attorney and the matter they are considering indicting you over. This posting your own blogs under other names is really cute, also a little sick. As for your ex shes having the time of her life with real men, guys who can perform like you never could... (her words not mine) talk to you later limpy

The Hunter

2/2/2010 08:07:01 am

Quit deluding yourself, Stoller. Your time would be better spent reading prison survival guides. You are done.

Limpy

2/2/2010 08:58:16 am

Say what?

History Lesson

2/2/2010 09:10:03 am

There is the true story of Tony Arcardo, who lived in River Forest, Illinois. Tony ran Chicago after "Big" Al.
After the Fed came into his beautiful River Forest home and planted "bugs", Tony knew he had to "move", because it was "impossible" to remove all of the "bugs" from his home.
The G was not trying to intimidate Tony, they just wanted INFORMATION...Today the bugs are smaller and 1000 times more sophisticated.
In the past the G had to follow someone with "three" cars if they wanted to know where that party was going. Today the G just plants a small GPS device to the auto and they track the car from a warm office location 24 hours a day, not to intimidate any body, just for information.

Divorce Lawyer

2/2/2010 10:53:12 pm

Here's a little love note from your favorite divorce lawyer:

Your going to get the chgance to take those sick little peeks down my blouse again real soon you pig. Those cases you mention are in another state and are ongoing divorces. Yours isn't. So you know what, your going back in front of Judge Porter. What do you think he'll do? By the way did you pay your fine? hmmmmmmmmm

Appellate Lawyer

2/3/2010 03:45:46 pm

Judge Porter's decision is on appeal and will be reversed. The divorce decision is "still" before the divorce court any way Your good at defending Section 1983 cases, because you and your crowd are being named, see'ya in court baby!

vibram five fingers sprint link

6/10/2010 06:21:30 pm

Unique design and the item of material is few. Looking at these things, really want to take it home. After reading the post I am to design a room of my own according to the post .On the other hand I also saw some websites, such as let me harvest a lot. Hurry to see!

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics