ILLINOIS COOK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT JUDGES TO RULE ON TWO STOLLER INDIRECT CRIMINAL COTEMPT CITATIONS

11/14/2009

LITIGATION IS A 'BLOOD' SPORT

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE WEEK BEFORE THE 2009 THANKSGIVING MEAL GOES INTO THE RECORD BOOKS, TWO ILLINOIS COOK COUNTY JUDGES WILL RULE ON STOLLER'S PETITIONS FOR INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITIONS CHARGING SEVERAL LAWYERS AND PROFESSIONALS WITH FELONIES. If convicted the respondents are staring at serious jail time. Litigation is a “blood” sport. This week the Washington DC sniper John Allen Mohammad was put to death by lethal injection. Get on the wrong side of the American Jurisprudence System and and the system will “kill”. Abuse the system and you can be charged with Indirect Criminal Contempt. Stoller this summer spent 37 days in the Illinois Cook County Jail for the “crime” of publishing “speech” on his former “blog”. Stoller would “never” have believed that a Illinois Circuit Court Judge would have locked him up for exercising his First Amendment Rights of “free” speech”. Likewise, the defendants in Stoller's two indirect criminal contempt petitions believe that “no” Illinois Cook County Judge will lock them up. Stoller's opponents sought to have him jailed for up to 6 months for publishing speech on the Internet. Stoller is seeking sentences of up to ten years for much more serious crimes. The Law firm of Gordon and Rees and the Washington D.C. Law firm of Roylance, Abrams, Berdo and Goodman have been dogging service of process of an Indirect Criminal Contempt Petition that has been properly lodged with the Illinois Cook County Courts. They and their attorneys who are defendants in the Indirect Criminal Contempt Petitions will soon learn why it is not a good idea to dodge service of process of any legal proceeding, let alone a Criminal Contempt Petition. In any event stay tuned this week there will be a lot of legal fire works to see before the holidayay

9 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Court Room Observer

11/13/2009 03:26:09 pm

Your turned out to be the "worst" enemy that he has ever seen...finally you are going to be treated that way...I told him that 4 years ago but he wouldn't listen...he deluded himself into believing all of that nonsense. Now finally he's got...you know how "slow" he is, he doesn't even understand movies without you...but now have the "third" time you locked him up, I have finally convinced him that you are his "worst" enemy that he has ever had and to deal with you under the law the way one must deal with their "worst" enemies... Your going to jail...

Otis Winkler

11/13/2009 07:51:16 pm

I didn't know there was a record book for Thanksgiving meals! Where can I get one? I suspect, Leo, that you will be eating crow for Thansgiving.

Bud

11/14/2009 12:08:56 am

I suspect he will be having a large slice of humble pie for desert to go with his helping of crow. Only one person has seen jail time from this litigation. That is the only person who will be seeing jail time.

Chip Douglas

11/14/2009 09:01:42 am

One would think that a "brilliant legal mind" like Stroller would understand that the First Amendment right to free speech is not absolute. There is no right to slander and libel people at will. We have laws prohibiting that. One would think that the time Stroller spent in jail impressed that fact on him. It appears that it will take additional jail time to impress upon him this fact. The train is rapidly approaching the station.

Metra

11/14/2009 03:15:07 pm

He is on that Metra train every day which takes him to the Union Station a few blocks from the Federal Court House at 219 S Dearborn and the Daley Center at 50 West Washington, that were the "train" takes him evey day...if someone feels that they are slandered they are free to bring a "defamation" lawsuit any time, but locking up someone for publishing speech on the Internet is a clear violation of the findings in the U.S. Supreme Court Case issued in 1996 ACLU v. Janet Reno...Circuit Court Judges may ignore the law and do what they want when they want, but remember there will be an accounting...the law is clearly on a blogger side notwithstanding what a locol judge decides...besides there is going to be a huge liability accruing to all of the parties who are responsible for incarcerating a "blogger" unlawfully...you going find that out shortly...when that "train" his you....

8219 W Grand Ave

11/14/2009 09:34:46 pm

He usually gets to the train station on a bicycle which he rides from 8219
Grand Ave in River Grove IL. I guess he doesn't want anyone to know that cause each time I post it he deletes it. It's a storefront property with the windows covered in newspaper. He blogs and hides there.

ChilizGirl

11/15/2009 12:48:01 am

I think it is wonderful that someone with Leo's special needs has learned to use the public transportation system. Those are the building blocks to independent living.

First he had to learn to differentiate among the different traffic signals. Then he probably taught himself to read a train schedule.

Pretty soon he might be able to pass one of those basic citizenship tests, the kind that asks who the first President was and includes a kindergarten quiz on the true purpose of the United States Court system.

After that, the sky will be the limit. Instead of having to constantly worry about getting into trouble with the courts and going to jail, maybe the courts will see how hard Leo is trying and designate a special needs in-basket for him.

I just hope someone was thoughtful enough to get Leo one of those tall orange flags that attach to a bicycle's rear tire. And maybe a basket for his handlebars. He is still probably a little overwhelmed by learning all the different traffic signals and bus schedules and such, and navigating around Chicago is tough for anyone.

Good for Leo. The human spirit is designed to conquer one's own limitations.

Anon

11/15/2009 01:25:01 pm

You know chili girl you are absolutely right. Leo has come a long way. Regarding the flag though I think just the sight of him coming down the street will suffice.

Stollerexposed.blog.com

Good advice

11/17/2009 05:10:43 pm

Just don't get in his way...everyone who is anyone, knows when he is coming to get out of his way or they just might get run over....

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics