ILLINOIS GORDON AND REES ATTORNEYS RYAN T. BROWN AND CHANCE L. COOPER SERVED WITH “CRIMINAL” CONTEMPT SUMMONS TODAY

1/22/2010

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-A CRIMINAL CONTEMPT SUMMONS WAS ISSUED AGAINST THE CHICAGO LAW FIRM OF GORDON AND REES, ATTORNEYS RYAN T. BROWN, CHANCE L. COOPER AND HAYNES RYAN ON October 27, 2009. Click of the link to see a copy of the complaint. Up until today, Jan. 20, 2010 only Attorney Haynes Ryan accepted service of summons of the criminal contempt citation and he has filed a Motion to dismiss Stoller Indirect Criminal Contempt Complaint. Stoller has responded. Click on link to see Stoller's response. From October 09 until January 19, 2010 Gordon and Rees attorneys Ryan T. Brown and Chance L. Cooper have refused to accept and/or wave service of summons. The Process Server finally penetrated the Gordon and Rees locked Chicago Office door, got inside and made his service of process on the said respondents. http://www.filefront.com/14756757/Lance-G.-Johnson-Charged-with-perjury0001.pdf of There next court hearing in Chicago Illinois is January 26, 2010 on the Criminal Contempt. http://www.filefront.com/15157881/Dec-15-2009-Order0001.pdf/
Stoller response to Haynes Ryan attempt to strike Stoller's Criminal Contempt petition.
http://www.filefront.com/15191477/responsetomotiontostrike_doc.pdf
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Haynes ryan, ryan brown, chance Cooper, Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman are considered innocient until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of all charges.
Even attorneys can only “run” from the law only so long, but eventually everyone gets nabs. Recently a An Indiana doctor Dec 18, 2009 accused of fraud and malpractice in the United States has been arrested while hiding on a mountain near a glacier in Italy ...Fugitive American Doctor (PHOTO & VIDEO) Arrested in Italy Doctor's long run ends on mountain - Mark Weinberger Gossip
SIDE BAR: Stoller's Process Servers fanned accross the City of Chicago and served 15 different parties with service of process including the Gordon and Rees attorneys

10 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Achilles

1/20/2010 07:31:25 am

What a day

Turbo

1/20/2010 11:40:35 am

Awesome! Rarely is one treated to a photojournal of the biggest loser in the history of the American legal system. Coming soon will be the ritualistic dismissal of Stoller's "cases," with the court saying what a joke and fraud he is. Why don't you take a picture of that rathole you live in, Leo? If any children read your crap, it would be a good learning tool for them to see how a grown man ends up when his whole life is based on hatred and lies. Leo, you will always be a clown. Nobody has ever taken you seriously and nobody ever will.

Absorbent Paper

1/20/2010 02:21:52 pm

Right on

Stoller = Scum

1/20/2010 02:43:00 pm

Looks like all of Stoller's appeals are now being dismissed because of the Seventh Circuit's order that found he perjured himself and prohibits him from filing in federal court. Adios, scumbag. And say hello to more jail time soon.

Declassified

1/20/2010 11:21:32 pm

An Appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court follows the Seventh Circuit "unconstitutional" proceedural Order dated Jan 7 2010 Case No.: 09-3463
The initial order barring "filings" deprives a citizen of its due process and equal protection rights under the 1st, 5th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution. The only difference between the USA and Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan is "due process" for its citizens. Without giving a citizen the right to axcess the courts, the USA becomes just like Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan!

Stooler

1/20/2010 11:27:02 pm

Tool !

Ive had a man

1/21/2010 01:40:26 pm

Oh LEO YOU SOUND LIKE SUCH A FOOL, I THOUGHT I'D BLOG FROM OUT HERE TO LET YOU KNOW I WAS JUST "FILLED" LIKE YOU COULD NEVER FILL ME AND AS IM USING MY FRIENDS COMPUTER HE IS ABOUT TO PLEASURE ME AGAIN. FOR OLD TIMES SAKE IM GOING TO CALL HIM CHRIS. OH? YOU DIDNT KNOW WHAT CHRIS DID?

Damages Suffered

1/21/2010 02:09:21 pm

Maybe some day we will get his name so that it can appear on as many pleadings along with your name. Make no mistake I hate captions of cases that have so few defendants. Anyway I sure you would like the support and maybe it can help pay your legal bills. Because in just a few more weeks you will be named in another multi million dollar complaint, might as well name all co-conspirators as well

Anon

1/21/2010 02:33:08 pm

Damages? Hahaha ho ho ho, Leo, you're killing us again with your clown act. You are the definition of libel proof, with your long history of condemnation by the courts for your scumbag, lying loser ways.

1/21/2010 03:05:43 pm

Exactly right, Anon. The courts call Leo the biggest scumbag in the world, and he is going to try to get the courts to award him damages for injuries to his reputation? What reputation? The reputation of being a complete scumbag in the legal system? His reputation is so well established that the courts can properly take judicial notice of the fact he is an absolute clown.

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics