Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

  • SUE THE BASTARDS
  • AEAE
  • AEJE
  • AEIPR
  • Rentamark
  • Archrive
  • PAGE 2
 

ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT JUSTICE FREEMAN GRANTS STOLLER'S MOTION

9/17/2010

8 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT JUSTICE FREEMAN GRANT'S STOLLER MOTION for an extension of time for filing  a petition for leave to appeal the decision of the Illinois Appellate Court affirming Judge Kathy Flanagan's Order quashing service of summons of Washington D.C. Attorneys Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman www.roylance.com . Who are defendants in an 100 million dollar defamation law suit. The Defendants  Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman were served with service of summons by Stoller special process server at a date later than the date Judge Kathy Flanagan Order striking service of summons by mail. Stoller is still appealing on public policy grounds.
 "Every decision, every order, until the last court speaks!" Stoller oldest case began in 1992 against the New England Telephone Company which concluded in 2000, eighteen years later. Stoller expects the Lance G. Johnson litigation to be Stoller "last" case in a 42 year litigation career, beginning in 1968 and going stronger than ever in 2010.

8 Comments
L-O-S-E-R
9/16/2010 07:21:43 pm

Go Leo, go, you can do it! You can become the first person in the history of American jurisprudence to never have prevailed on the merits in anything during the course of an entirely wasted life. You can do it, Fattie, you can do it! We believe in you!

Reply
I forget
9/16/2010 09:31:00 pm

Why exactly is Leo suing the Roylance people? Were they the ones that threw him in jail for being stupid/crazy/contemptuous?

Reply
Leo the loser
9/17/2010 01:40:18 am

Really, Leo? Your "litigation career" is so sad that you now consider a routine motion to extend time to file to be a major victory worth trumpeting?

You may be the most pathetically delusional person I have ever run across.

Reply
Lex Luther
9/17/2010 08:25:13 am

A routine motion to extend time granted by the highest court in Illinois?
Why trumpet that?
So that all parties have notice that every decision in every case will be appealed to a higher court, which will extended the time to file briefs, extending the litigation indefinitely. Remember defendants, expect that it will "never" end, that is what is being trumped! You city is surrounded, the "litigation siege" will "never" end!

A "litigation siege" is a legal blockade of a controversy with the intent of conquering by attrition!

Now maybe you legal neandeerthals can under stand when you hear the trumpets sound, they are just sending a message, "3 more years!" "3 more years!"

Reply
Gene Siskel
9/17/2010 08:36:13 am

Question? Who has more fun in the movies the villians or the hero?
Lex Luther or Batman?
Lex Luther of course, winning to Lex Luther is not like winning to a "normal" person now is it?
Lex Luther "wins" costing his enemies millions of dollars. Lex Luther wins every day that he keeps the controversy going. That's what makes a great movie! Batman however is always stressed out, ready to have a heart attack, whild Lex Luther is always laughing!
The balcony is closed...

Reply
The Bull
9/17/2010 03:22:12 pm

you stupid shit leo. Do you think anyone cares? how long it goes on doesnt matter we use secretaries and law clerks to respond to your pleadings and we dont even bother showing up on court. So who cares how long it goes on for

We responf to you on this blog only in hopes of driving you crazy

And you know what chump? I really did fuck her

Reply
Yuck
9/17/2010 03:53:19 pm

You like the old ladies huh? I can recomend you to a site that has 1000's of women over 50 who are looking for a date. I perfer them under under 30

Reply
black timberland boots link
10/14/2010 06:54:16 pm

On a certain cheap timberland boots day at a certain hour, we will pull into the station. Bands will be playing and flags discount timberland boots waving. Once we get there, so many wonderful timberland winter boots dreams will come true and the pieces of our lives will fit together like a completed jigsaw puzzle. How restlessly we pace the aisles, womens timberland boot the minutes for loitering --waiting, waiting, waiting for the station.But uppermost in our timberland shoes store minds is the final destination. On a certain day at a certain hour, we will pull into the station. Bands will be playing and timberland eye boat flags waving. Tucked away in our timberland for you subconscious is an idyllic vision. We see ourselves on a long trip that timberland 6 inch spans the continent. We are traveling by train. Out timberland hiking boots windows, we drink in the passing scene of cars on nearby highways, of children timberland shoe company waving at a crossing, of cattle grazing on a distant timberland boots hillside, of smoke pouring from a power plant, of row upon row of corn and wheat, of flatlands and timberland wheat shoes valleys, of mountains and rolling classic 3 eye timberland boat hillsides, of city skylines and village halls.But uppermost in our black timberland boots minds is the final destination. http://www.timberland4you.co.uk/ YQ

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
    Internships not available now
    ​


     Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
    FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​
    YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
    Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
     The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
     Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that  supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
     The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
    LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. 
    The author(s)  graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. The Author(s)  are the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics experts  and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation  Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions.  AEAE, P.O.  Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
    312-545-4554
    Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE  Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
     "Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
    Litigation is the Air We Breathe
    Litigation is War,

    Welcome to the Front!"


     To Prove Defamation Case?
    What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm. 
    The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation 

    The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

    “[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
    AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

    ​AEAE has the legal  right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators,  business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE  18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

    VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

    DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.



    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    July 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    January 2015
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Categories
    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested  persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

    All
    Jewelry Frauds
    Scams
    Yellow Diamonds

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.