
![]() JUDGE WILLIAM J. HIBBLER CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ILLINOIS DISTRICT COURT JUDGE WILLIAM J. HIBBLER ISSUED AN ORDER ON 10/02/2009 stating," The Court DENIES Appellant's Motion for Reconsideration. As indicated on Pure Fishing's Certificate of Service, Pure Fishing served Appellant with a copy of its motion to dimiss". Stoller claimed that he never received a copy of the pure fishing Motion and that Judge Hibbler had "no" jurisdiction. Judge Hibbler wrote ,"The Court lacked jurisdiction is unfounded..." "The fact that a party mails a document creates a rebutable presumption that the addressee actually received the mailing" Hagen v. US . However, it is NOT conclusive evidence that the receiving party actually received the mailing. Stoller will ask the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals to decide the case today by filing his Appeal. [email protected] This is your new blog post. Click here and start typing, or drag in elements from the top bar.
3 Comments
Law Professor
10/4/2009 12:43:57 pm
The only way an attorney will ever get respect form a District Court Judge is to appeal and have that Judges decision reversed. That is why lawyers who engaged in Appellate Practice take so many years to win the respect of trial court judges....
Reply
Pete Pekulis
10/4/2009 09:49:39 pm
When a legal expert like Leo Stoller loses every single case, there is something wrong with the legal system.
Reply
Uncle Earnie
10/5/2009 12:22:25 am
To the contrary, it shows that the system is working when a vexatious litigator is constantly rebuked by the courts.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
|