JUSTICE STEPHEN BREYER GRANTS STOLLER MOTION

8/6/2010

WASHINGTON-(AEAE)-JUSTICE STEPHEN BREYER GRANTED STOLLER'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI. Stoller filed a mandamus action against the Illinois Appellate Court with the Illinois Supreme Court. The Illinois Appellate Court deprived Stoller of his due process by refusing to hear several divorce appeals. Stoller sued the Illinois Appellate Court First division before the Illinois Supreme Court by way of a mandamus action. Stoller has appealed the Illinois Supreme Court decision directly to the U.S. Supreme Court. Stoller already has a pending fully briefed Writ of Certiorari pending before the U.S. Supreme Court in the Stoller v. the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals case. Leo Stoller is an Appellate Court Expert especially trained in the Rules of the U.S. Supreme Court.

The model of AEAE is “Until the last court speaks!” Stoller takes every case to the High Court because it is only when the U.S. Supreme Court Rules that counts, every other decision by every other court is meaningless! Copy of Judge Breyer's order http://www.filefront.com/17177730/July-30-2010-Supreme-Court-Order0001.jpg/

5 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships available
312-545-4554

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

Leo SUXXX it

8/5/2010 06:32:46 pm

From the files of the United States Supreme Court, MAY 27, 2008:

"07-10194
STOLLER, LEO V. ATTORNEY REGISTRATION
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari
is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly
abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept
any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner
unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the
petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin
v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per
curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases
cited therein."

Are you ready to submit the required 40 copies of your documents, along with the required $300 filing fee?

Leo the Zero

8/6/2010 01:08:57 am

When the Supremes issue their obligatory order denying review of Leo's ridiculous filings, maybe this time they will note that Leo Stoller, indeed, has no dick.

specialist

8/6/2010 02:33:00 am

Yeah right a master of the Supreme Court, oh god how funny. hey Leo, how's Chris doing? I understand he is now in the maximum Security division and guess what no charges being dropped

Informant

8/6/2010 01:10:03 pm

I passed the word to an inmate at Lake County that Chris Stoller is a informer. Gee I wonder how Chris is doing?

Fattie make a funny

8/6/2010 03:24:30 pm

Fattie make a funny. Fattie can't even bring a lawsuit in a county court without getting it dismissed. Fattie can't even get a state appellate court to hear his appeals. Fattie can't file in the federal district court because he got banned there. Fattie can't file in the federal appellate court because he got banned there too. Fattie already got banned once by the U.S. Supreme Court for abusing its process. Fattie thinks the U.S. Supreme Court is going to waste its time listening to his psycho babble. Fattie is a funny guy. Fattie should just spend his time dressing up like a woman and dancing around his rathole.

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics