LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS AND ALFRED GOODMAN WERE \"NO\" SHOWS IN THEIR FIRST HEARING ON DEC. 15, IN THEIR CRIMINAL CONTEMPT CHARGE

12/17/2009

JOHNSON YOU BETTER BE THERE!

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-IN A HEARING ON DECEMBER 15, 2009 IN CHICAGO DALEY CENTER IN COURT ROOM 1307 NONE OF THE DEFENDANTS IN A CRIMINAL CONTEMPT CHARGE SHOWED UP. MISSING WAS THE WELL KNOWN WAHINGTON D.C. ATTORNEYS LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS AND AFRED GOODMAN WWW.ROYLANCE.COM . There attorneys from the famous law firm of Gordon and Rees were no shows as well. Judge Gillespie agreed to continue the hearing until January 19, 2010 when he said, “I want to see all of the defendants in my court room at 9:30am.” The question is will Lance G. Johnson and his crew still defy the jurisdiction of the Illinois Cook County Court System to avoid facing the “criminal” contempt citation? How long will these famous attorneys “run” from the law?

SIDEBAR: MR. LANCE JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS AND AFRED GOODMAN YOUR PRESENTS IS REQUIRED ON JANUARY 19, 2010 in downtown Chicago at the Daley Center, 50 W. Washington, court Room 1307 at 9:30AM. Be there!

NOTICE: Stoller was unable to blog for the last two days. He was involved in court hearings, drafting appeals and an extended legal “fire fight” with several multi million dollar defendants which took him a couple of days to bring them under control. More later...

6 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Nazgul

12/16/2009 02:51:22 pm

If I was Lance G. Johnson I would never show up in that Chicago Court Room. Bernie Madoff's problem was that he showed up in a court room, he should have taken off with all of his money some say

Lady Justice

12/17/2009 12:38:43 am

According to the court records, this Dec. 15 hearing never happened. It was stricken and reset when the Gordon & Rees guy filed a motion to strike. You made up the quotes.

Phil DiGardenia

12/17/2009 07:38:26 am

What? Leo is not telling the truth?

Mike Hunt

12/17/2009 08:46:04 am

More dishonesty from Leo? This explains why the grand jury is about to indict him.

Court Observer

12/17/2009 10:00:40 am

Yee of little faith, some day you all will come to accept that he does everything he says that he does, including the fact that there was a hearing on Lance G. Johnson Chicago Court Hearing on Dec. 15, 2009. After which Judge Daniel T. Gillespie signed an order. Which I now see is available for down load. For you, "seeing is believing". You won't become "true" believers until you are seeing a "judgment" with your name on it

Bullshit link

12/17/2009 10:39:51 am

Hey leo more fake docs ehh?! Good going. You do know there coming for you right? Maybe you can get a cell next to your bro.

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics