LAW FIRM GORDON AND REES THREATENS STOLLER ALLEDGING STOLLER MADE DEFAMATORY STATEMETS THAT GO WELL BEYOND "PROTECTED FREE SPEECH"

11/3/2009

Hayes Ryan

CHICAGO-(AEAE)- THE LAW FIRM OF GORDON & REES SENT STOLLER A CEASE AND DESIST LETTER DATED OCTOBER 29, 2009 ASSERTING FALSE AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS ON THIS WEBSITE. Gordon and Rees stated that "recent statements on your website go well beyond protected free speech. Examples of your false and misleading statements include: Gordon & Rees LLP, Ryan T. Brown, Chance L. Cooper and J. Haynes Ryan have geen charged with criminal contempt and Judge Kathy Flanagan granted Stoller's request to file indirect criminal contempt felony charges against the law firm of Gordon & Rees LLP, Ryan t. Btrown, Hayes Ryan and Chance L. Cooper."
"These statements, which are factually and legally inaccurate, may mislead the public into believing that criminal charges have been filed against the firm and/or named attorneys buy a policing agency. In this connection, your statements have caused and continue to cause, serious irreparable injury to this firm's reputation and the reputation of the individual attorneys named."
Stoller has denied publishing any false, inaccurate information on this blog. The number one defense against any defamation claim is the "truth." However, Stoller has requested a meeting with Gordon and Rees officials to reach a amicable resolution. Stoller asked Attorney Hayes Ryan to set up a meeting.
Stoller also requests wheither Gordon and Rees will accept service of summons of the alledged "criminal contempt" summons and complaint. Thus far Haynes Ryan has refused to accept service of process for himself and on behalf of his firm and Chance Cooper and Ryan T. Brown. The summons has the words "criminal contempt" on it and it is signed by Judge Daniel T. Gellipsi 1507.
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed on this blog are those of Leo Stoller. The Law Firm of Gordon and Rees LLP, attorneys Ryan T. Brown, Chance L. Cooper and J. Haynes Ryan are considered innocient of all alledged charges until proven guilty beyond any reasonable doubt at trial.

8 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Helen

11/1/2009 02:02:11 pm

I know Haynes Ryan he is such a "nice" guy.

Rick

11/2/2009 12:15:50 am

It is sad to find out who your friends are...They sometimes live a double life.

Dick Daley

11/2/2009 03:51:08 am

I wish you had a blackberry or an iphone, Leo, so you could do live bloging from teh courtroom. I hate to wait a whole day to hear what the outcome was from your courtroom apearances.

Chip

11/2/2009 05:21:58 am

Rest assured Leo is getting his usual beat down in court.

Dick Johnson

11/3/2009 03:03:11 am

He is "still" in the game, having survived "everything" that his enemies could through at him...right now he is having his MacCarther Moment...he is either winning his 100 battles or holding his own...and now he has a "new" weapon, thanks to the famous Chip Douglass, to use on his enemies, he never new it existed until it was used on him...and now that legal weapon is being employed on all of his enemies. That what I have been told by sources close to him...

Chris

11/3/2009 10:14:50 am

Stollerexposed.blog.com

Anon

11/4/2009 02:19:39 pm

Stoller, it is certainly apt that you are using "Dick" as your name for your fake posts. And your misdeeds have led you into bankruptcy, jail time, awards of more than a million dollars against you, court orders barring you from filing complaints as a vexatious litigant, etc. If that is winning in your book, I'm looking forward to you truly crashing and burning.

Billy Bop

11/4/2009 03:03:07 pm

Sounds like someone has been having a lot of fun...ain't the California surfer dude Anon, like he has "no" sense of humor...I'll bet when he is in a "bar" he orders "water" and has spent his entire life in a library because of his perfect grammer. He don't lie, cheat or steal...by golly he ain't any fun at all...please pass me another whiskey and a joint!

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics