LAWYERS FREE GAME IN A MALICIOUS PROSECUTION LAW SUIT

5/7/2010

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-2nd District Court of Appeal in California reinstated Franklin Mint's malicious prosecution lawsuit against Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, the firm that sued Franklin for hawking plates and other collectibles bearing the likeness of the so-called People's Princess. Justice Thomas Willhite said that Manatt had no probable cause to bring trademark dilution or false advertising claims against Franklin on behalf of the firm's clients, the late princess's estate and The Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fund. Making the law firm of Manatt, Phelps & Phillips free game in the malicious prosecution action and giving pleasure to those who enjoy suing attorneys. "No reasonable attorney," Willhite wrote in a 50-page opinion, would conclude that Princess Diana used her name in such a way that it could be protected by trademark. Justice Steven Suzukawa concurred. The ruling in Franklin Mint Co. v. Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, BC285388, reversed now-retired Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Warren Ettinger, who granted Manatt's motion for nonsuit after a 17-day jury trial.

Franklin Mint sued Manatt and firm partner Mark Lee, claiming that their unsuccessful 1998 lawsuit was a malicious attempt to hurt sales of Diana memorabilia. Franklin Mint settled its claims against Diana's estate and charity trust fund. Leo Stoller is the nations leading trademark and Appellate Expert.

7 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Stop it, you're too funny

5/6/2010 04:37:28 pm

hahahahahahaha stop it, you're killing us, Leo hahahahahaha nation's leading trademark expert and appellate expert hahahahahahaha oh, my god, Leo, you should have forsaken your career as a vexatious litigant for standup comedy hahahahaha
hahahahaha

Who cares

5/7/2010 08:10:19 am

Your wrong, Bitch. Those of us who litigate for a living, (and that doesn't include a pro se rube such as yourself), couldn't careless about being sued and most of our clients aren't really concerned because they are represented by the best.

So really Bitch, who cares?

I think Bitch is a good name for you Leo, you'll see a number of use it in the future. Well I'm going out tonight with friends for dinner and to see a show. How are you spending your evening Bitch? Alone I'm sure, crank out some more law suits, we let the paralegals practice on them with you

Psychologists

5/7/2010 03:22:02 pm

Bitch is a common expression used by male and female homosexuals. Many parties claim that "homosexuals are the most fun to sue!" According to an ABA report.

Sievers

5/14/2010 03:24:15 am

Allison Sievers of Lavely and Singer did this and got the city to pay millions for it.

Look at case 8CA10541 in the CCB in downtown L.A

vibram fivefingers shoes link

6/7/2010 07:18:07 pm

Here elaborates the matter not only extensively but also detailly .I support the
write's unique point.It is useful and benefit to your daily life.You can go those www. vibram fivefingers classic women
sits to know more relate things.They are strongly recommended by friends.Personally

dior handbags link

6/8/2010 03:40:04 pm

Here elaborates the matter not only extensively but also detailly .I support the
write's unique point.It is useful and benefit to your daily life.You can go those
sits to know more relate things.They are strongly recommended by friends.Personally www.dboe-for.com

vibram fivefingers sprint wome link

6/10/2010 06:17:53 pm

Unique design and the item of material is few. Looking at these things, really want to take it home. After reading the post I am to design a room of my own according to the post .On the other hand I also saw some websites, such as let me harvest a lot. Hurry to see!

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics