MAN GETS 30 YEARS FOR POSSESSION OF A COMPUTER

9/4/2010

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-HAVING A COMPUTER IN YOUR HOME CAN CAN LAND YOU IN JAIL FOR A LONG TIME, SAY 30 Years? A St. Charles, Illinois coach was convicted Thursday of nine counts of possession of child pornography. The judge ruled that evidence of “website cookies” and “Internet favorites” on the hard drive of his computer indicated he had possession of child pornography. Even though no actual pornography was actually found in his home. Nor was there any evidence that the coach was ever using the computer or that the computer was even his computer. His defense lawyer unsuccessfully argued that “there was no evidence that the coach knew the stuff was there.”
Illinois Judge Timothy Q. Sheldon did find the coach not guilty on four other counts of possession of child pornography, because the “website cookies” had been removed according to the prosecution's computer expert.

The author of this blog was convicted for using his home computer of the “crime” of publishing speech on the Internet in former blog. Rentamark.blog.com and did 37 days in the Illinois Cook County Jail from June 8, 2009 to July 15, 2008.

Of course today all of the parties, including the Illinois Cook County Sheriff, Thomas Dart, are facing a 100 million dollar false arrest, false imprisonment law suit which was filed in Cook County Illinois in February of 2010.

SIDEBAR: Having a computer in your home can be dangerous to your health, even if you do not own the computer. The mere possession of it can land you ass in jail, not withstanding that such a false arrest is in clear violation of Section 1983 Civil rights.

America system of justice is now in line with Russia, Iran and North Korea

3 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

THE PUBLIC HAS A RIGHT TO KNOW LEO SUCKS

9/3/2010 06:16:43 pm

http://www.scribd.com/doc/23569139/LANCE-JOHNSON-RESPONDS-TO-LEO-STOLLER

Lance Johnson and the law firm of Roylance, Abrams, Berdo & Goodman LLP are widely recognized within the legal profession as being among the top intellectual property attorneys in the country.

Leo Stoller, on the other hand (who is not an attorney by the way), is the cartoonish-character who represents himself as a "legal expert." The courts, however, have stated that "Leo Stoller's lack of credibility is a matter of public record." Leo Stoller is probably best known for launching personal attacks against those who bring his egregious misconduct to light.

This filing in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit-- a Response to Stoller's Combined Motions to Disqualify and Suspend Lance Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman from practicing before the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit-- illustrates Leo Stoller's penchant for bringing frivolous claims and launching personal attacks against those who expose his unscrupulous tactics.

The United States judiciary owes a debt of gratitude to people like Lance Johnson and the law firm of Roylance, Abrams, Berdo & Goodman LLP for serving the dual purpose of providing top-notch representation to their clients while defending the integrity of the legal system against the judicial abuse launched by the likes of Leo Stoller.

Leo Stoller currently represents himself to the public as the executive director of the "Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE)", which he claims "is a not for profit group that advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974."

Reality

9/3/2010 10:21:07 pm

Fact: 'ABA Professor', just like a majority of postings on this cartoon blog, is Leo Stoller engaged in one of his schizophrenic monologues with himself. For the same reason his right hand is his only source of personal pleasure, this blog is his his only source of social pleasure, as he is so mentally deranged that his family has disowned him, he has no friends, and he lives in a rathole where his only source of gratification is this sociopathic blog.

Fact: The 'AEJE' is short for 'Americans for Judicial Ethics', which is an even bigger joke than Leo Stoller's one-man comedy routine he refers to as the 'AEAE', short for Americans for Enforcement of Attorney Ethics.' Not to long ago, Leo crowed all over his blog about how his brother, Christopher Stoller, was the 'executive director' of the 'AEJE' scam. Christopher Stoller promptly got himself thrown in jail.

Fact: Both Christopher Stoller and Leo Stoller are such losers that, well, they both have been in and out of jail more times than Liberace's man servant was in and out of him.

Fact: Leo Stoller has been banned from the federal district courts, the federal appellate courts, has been barred from further filings with the U.S. Supreme Court, and there are more cases talking about what a lowlife fraud Leo Stoller than there are rat's in Leo's rathole abode.

Fact: Leo Stoller is of circus midget size and grotesquely obese. For those of us who have been near him, he smells like a rotting corpse and is a prime example why coroner's often put vapor rub under their nostrils when dealing with decaying bodies. In Leo's case, the decay is his non-functioning brain.

Fact: Leo Stoller is such a voice for justice that he was adjudged an unfit parent and had to deal his way out of charges brought against him for setting up a bogus charity for 9/11 victims.

Fact: Anyone can create a Weebly blog for purposes of calling themself an expert in anything from the law to midget fornication in the West Indies. Anyone other than Leo Stoller himself who would consider Leo a legal expert is nuttier than Leo is.

Fact: Leo Stoller, indeed, has no dick.

Peter, Paul, Mark, Luke and John

9/4/2010 04:21:31 pm

Lies, lies all evil lies
We advise you never to listen
to their lies
Arise to chastise them
but never listen to their lies
These are godless pagans
They realize that this is the only way to prevent upright people from justice and peace amongst the peoples of earth. That’s what’s so diabolical about this conspiracy. Most people don’t even know about this dilemma, much less understand how ruthless these people really are.
These people who left the comments above are apart of a massive disease that is spreading. These people are also the same people who talk in movie theaters.

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics