MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING TODAY IN THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFF THOMAS DART MALICIOUS PROSECUTION CASE

9/15/2010

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THIS MORNING IS A HEARING IN THE 100 MILLION DOLLAR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, FALSE ARREST AND FALSE IMPRISIONMENT CASE AGAINST THE ILLINOIS COOK COUNTY SHERIFF THOMAS DART. A motion for summary judgment has been filed before Illinois Circuit Court Judge Allen Goldberg in the Thomas Dart false arrest case which is up today. Thomas Dart the Illinois Cook County Sheriff is also seeking a run for the Major of Chicago since Mayor Richard M. Daley has decided not to run for a 7th term in February.

7 Comments

You are a clown

9/15/2010 01:42:52 am

Hear you made more of an ass of yourself than usual this morning. They are still laughing at you on the 23rd floor.

We didnt bother to go

9/15/2010 02:22:06 am

why even bother to appear. Stoller isn't ever going to get a motion heard much less granted.

starting to think everyone has had enough of you skumbag?

Reality

9/15/2010 03:06:49 am

Way to go, Fat Ass, made a complete clown of yourself again did you? Maybe you should go to the Daley Center employment office and try to get a job scrubbing toilets. You'll see more of your "lawsuits" move forward in that job, rather than your fantasy-wannabe-lawyer thing-- all of your stuff winds up in the Daley Center's toilets anyway.

laughter

9/15/2010 04:49:41 am

After Stoller left the court romm, everyone was looking at his "pleading" and laughing, the clerk was calling her friends to come look at it.

Well pig face you scored big again didin't you?

I know your going to appeal.................

The Bull

9/15/2010 08:12:22 am

Do you really think anyone is going to treat you like your an attorney, stoller. An attorney would have been allowed to enter a full briefing schedule on a real SJ motion. In your case no one believed you served anyone and of course felt you were just trying to create court appearances, so no one shows up and it just gets tossed aside, just like you have been tossed aside by everyone and I mean EVERYONE

Blazzaro

9/16/2010 06:14:41 am

The body count on the lawyers being sue today now exceeds 50+, by January the frecord breaking number will be over 100.
Gosh once they have become defendants, they lose their ability to get insurance, and they can be in the system for 10 years before the case is determined to be "frivilious" according to the experts. Now that's realy Saturday Night Live "Funny!"

However, the Illinois Supreme Court clerks do not find any of the pleading "funny" even if the clerks below do. Welcome to the litigation system, expect to be there until at least 2020+ we will see if you're still laughting then. Wait to see what is being filled against you next, it will knock you socks, laughting.

Leo the loser

9/16/2010 07:55:07 am

The Illinois Supreme Court clerks find your filings funny too fat boy. You just can't hear them laughing because they laugh in chambers as your filings never get past the PLA stage.

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Categories
Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation. AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website.

RSS Feed

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics