NASA-WORLD TO END NEXT WEEK?

3/10/2012

WORLD TO END NEXT WEEK!

FLORIDA-AEAE-EVERYONE WAS AWARE OR SHOULD BEEN AWARE THAT “The Sun’s surface erupted with a series of solar storms this week, sending a barrage of electrically charged particles crashing into the Earth’s magnetic field. So far, the solar blasts have caused only minor disruptions to terrestrial communications systems. But more solar eruptions are on the way over the next few days. The Sun is mid-way through an 11-year solar storm cycle that can have a major impact on human activities here on Earth - and in space. Solar storms can disrupt electric power grids, triggering black-outs and false alarms at power stations, as well as interfering with high frequency radio communications. Dr. Harold Goldenshalf a solar scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center who studies Sun storm activity, now predicts backed by an official alert issued Thursday by the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA] that “by the end of next week the first waves of solar activity will reach the Earth causing electric grid failure, loss of communications with satellites, total disruption of air travel, causing the avionics to fail in all air craft, loss of cell phone, land telephone lines and a total crash of the Internet causing a world wide calamity of bible proportions which could end life as we know it on the planet in keeping with the prediction of the ancient Maya calendar.” Predictions: Mayan 2012 Calendar Date In Prophecy
Solar storm shakes Earth's magnetic field
By Leo Stoller View this Author's Spotlight

6 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Jerry Spence

3/10/2012 01:27:15 am

Entrapment - inducing a person to commit an offense that the person would otherwise have been unlikely to commit.

F.LEE BAILY

3/10/2012 01:04:39 pm

So here's how it works. Entrapment is a defense. You will first be arrested soon if not already. You will be taken to jail. You will be arraigned. A judge will set a bond. If you can't pay the bond you will be held in jail until your trial, any where for three months to, a year generally in Cook County. You will be given a jury trial if you request. You been through the drill. If you found guilty you will be sentenced to up to a year in jail and given credit for the time you spent in jail. If you succeed in a successful Entrapment defense, you might be found not guilty. However, entrapment defenses seldom work especially in the type of case that you are being charged with. However, it is nice to know that you are thinking about your defense. But in this case the jury will see that you are as guilty as sin and you will do the well deserved time. It was just a matter of time until you got nailed. Remember what comes around goes around. Treat others as you would have them treat you and that is exactly what we are doing in this case. See you in court because that is the only place that we ever want to see you. Sweet dreams

3/11/2012 12:42:26 am

No, you don't get it. The DA will never file on a case like this. In fact, the cops will never even present it to the DA. The cops and DA all hate you. They will not do shit for you. You are pathetic.

Frank Drebin

3/12/2012 02:18:10 am

Law enforcement routinely receives cases that do not meet the minimum standard for prosecution. The case you manufactured is one such case.

In this case, you initiated contact with a person that is the subject or a protective order. The other party responded to your contact in a civilized manner. No threats were made. In cases such as this, there is no violation of the law. If not for your actions, there would have been no contact. The elements that would make this a criminal act simply do not exist.

As a result, no one is going to be arrested. Law enforcement routinely rejects cases like this. You are delusional if you think they will waste time on a case like this. No amount of legal maneuvering on your part will change this result.

This case is closed.

F.Lee Baily

3/12/2012 02:09:09 pm

In my 48 years in the practice I have been surprised at what cases prosecutors take. There is always that one that wants to make a name for himself. Any way they are very interested in this case and they will let the jury decide the case. The case is not closed. The prosecutor speculated that the person charged in this case will probably take a plea and this case will never go to trial. You all know the drill. How many Innocent people take pleas every day to avoid prosecution.

......

3/14/2012 06:05:35 am

You have not practiced law a day in your life as you are not a licensed attorney. The only thing you have practiced is fraud and deceit.

Regarding the case in question, this is not a case when a prosecutor makes a name for him self. No prosecutor would go forward with a case like this. They would not waste their time on it. What you fail to understand is that everyone in the legal system hates you. No one is going to do your dirty work for you.

The only case you need to be concerned with is the one where you go on trial on April 23. THAT is a case where a prosecutor will want to make a name for themselves. They are going to hammer you and you having your son will not keep you out of prison. The only one you are fooling is yourself.

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics