Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

  • SUE THE BASTARDS
  • AEAE
  • AEJE
  • AEIPR
  • Rentamark
  • Archrive
  • PAGE 2
 

OFFICIAL JANUARY 29, 2010 TRANSCRIPT OF ATTORNEY LANCE G. JOHNSON HEARING ON INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT NOW POSTED HERE

2/19/2010

13 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER HAD CHARGED WASHINGTON D.C. ATTORNEYS LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS, ALFRED GOODMAN AND their lawyers with Indirect Criminal Contempt. Click on to see a copy of the complaint  http://www.filefront.com/14756757/Lance-G.-Johnson-Charged-with-perjury0001.pdf  The next court hearing in Chicago Illinois was held on January 29, 2010 on the Criminal Contempt. See a copy of the official transcript http://www.filefront.com/15606995/1-29-%202010%20Johnson%20Contempt%20hearing%20Transcript.pdf  Stoller filed his notices of appeals on Friday January 29, 2010 and is confident that he will be able to reverse Judge Gillespie attached decision. Click on the attached link to down load a copy of Stoller's Notices of appeals and the Court Decision . Stoller filed his notices of appeals on Friday January 29, 2010 and is confident that he will be able to reverse Judge Gillespie attached decision. Click on the attached link to down load a copy of Stoller's Notices of appeals and the Court Decision http://www.filefront.com/15458281/Notice%20of%20Appeal0001.pdf.

13 Comments
On the Edge
2/16/2010 03:46:35 pm

It is not easy to lock of 6 lawyers even if you have the evidence against them

Reply
Party Tonight Like your on Bourbon Street!
2/16/2010 04:10:48 pm

The distance from Chicago to Bourbon Street? Nearly 1,000 miles. Despite that, Chicago has a lot of New Orleans spirit, after all, it's an excuse to party hard in the middle of the week. Are you ready to let loose, succumb to a hurricane-induced buzz and see exactly how many strands of bead your neck can hold and Meet the worlds most litigious litigator, author and blogger at the Chicago Bayou tonight. Sample a free bowl of jambalaya or gumbo while relaxing to tunes from the Daryl Coutts Band. The party takes a turn at 10 P.M when Vaudezilla Productions' burlesque beauties strut their stuff on the bar top New Orleans style. No cover everyone is invited if you show up late there is always the “over” flow room. Discussion at 7:00PM

Reply
Anon
2/16/2010 04:42:33 pm

Little man loses again. Way to go, limpy.

Reply
X
2/16/2010 08:50:06 pm

Guess who I saw on the 15 Feb on his way to South Bend to see his son? Joe Montanna and guess what? He never heard of you,spent any time with you, or used any of your tennis racquets as per your claim on 6 Feb on this blog. Is this your way of planning your insanity defense? Are you going to claim you're delusional?

Reply
D. Peterson link
2/16/2010 11:52:54 pm

To quote Judge Gillespie: "that [Stoller's appeal] is a waste of time. That is going nowhere"

Very rarely do you see such a beatdown in court. Well done.

Reply
Chili Fan
2/17/2010 12:35:17 am

Kudos to Judge Gillespie. A guardian of justice as well as taxpayer money.

Actually, X, Leo probably won't be trying the cuckoo defense. His brother, Christopher, went that route and wound up in an Arizona prison for over a year.
Check out the "Leo Stoller and Christopher Stoller Incarceration Reports" at stollerexposed.blog.com.

As far as Leo's fantasies about partying with Joe Montana, he has a recurring juvenile fantasy that he is some type of celebrity. Check out "Leo Stoller's Hollywood Fantasy" at stollerexposed.blog.com. That was when Leo insisted he was given a list of the Oscar winners "straight from Hollywood" prior to the awards presentation. (Under the condition he did not broadcast the winners until after the awards. Idiot.)

And Leo's claims Joe Montana uses one of Leo's tennis racquets? My, Leo must have a fully-functioning manufacturing plant in that rathole closet he lives in. Check out "Christopher" (Leo) Stoller's recent application to the Trademark Trial and appeal board. http://www.scribd.com/doc/26351506/LEO-STOLLER-AND-THE-TRADEMARK-OFFICE-77424372-OFFICE-ACTION.

Leo Stoller lies about everything and anything. The courts know it, he knows it, and everyone in the legal community knows it. Piss on him.

Reply
Joe
2/17/2010 03:10:58 am

I "never" used Stoller's tennis rackets I did use Stoller's patented curve handle racket ball racket. The best in the world.

Reply
The God Father
2/17/2010 12:03:09 pm

nough of this white trash. WSe all know what must be done

Reply
Details, Details, Details
2/18/2010 01:38:14 am

The signature by the court reporter looks alot like your Sharpie signature on the Response to the Motion. You can get in trouble for that sort of thing, ya' know.

Reply
Trouble
2/18/2010 04:54:43 pm

Isn't that his middle name

Reply
Stoller = Reptile
2/21/2010 12:58:20 pm

Actually, Stoller's middle name is little limpy.

Reply
Bar Novo
2/22/2010 01:24:16 pm

I don' think so

Reply
adidas shoes outlet link
6/7/2010 03:33:57 pm

Hhe article's content rich variety which make us move for our mood after reading this article. surprise, here you will find what you want! Recently, I found some wedsites which commodity is colorful of fashion. Such as www.sec-torand.com that worth you to see. Believe me these websites won’t let you down.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
    Internships not available now
    ​


     Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
    FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​
    YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
    Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
     The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
     Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that  supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
     The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
    LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. 
    The author(s)  graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. The Author(s)  are the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics experts  and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation  Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions.  AEAE, P.O.  Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
    312-545-4554
    Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE  Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
     "Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
    Litigation is the Air We Breathe
    Litigation is War,

    Welcome to the Front!"


     To Prove Defamation Case?
    What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm. 
    The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation 

    The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

    “[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
    AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

    ​AEAE has the legal  right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators,  business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE  18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

    VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

    DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.



    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    July 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    January 2015
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Categories
    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested  persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

    All
    Jewelry Frauds
    Scams
    Yellow Diamonds

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.