PARENT AWARDED 4.9 MILLION DOLLARS IN LAWSUIT AGAINST CHILD REPRESENTATIVE, PSYCHOLOGISTS, EX-HUSBAND AND DIVORCE LAWYER

3/14/2010

CHIAGO-(AEAE)- A mother filed lawsuit against a child representative, opposing divorce lawyer, her x-husband and the court appointed child psychologists. She claimed the had unjustly taken her children in June 2005. The children were ages 6 and 9 at the time. The false accusation against her was that she had shown her children children pornography on the Internet.
The children were placed in their father's custody, and the mother was forced to endure the humiliation of supervised visits for a short time before she was .deprived of visitation for several years. The father had “destroyed” the family. But wait! The mother recovered from the injustice done to her enough to file a lawsuit based on violations of Constitutional law. She went after the Ex-spouse, the divorce lawyer, the child representative and, the child representative.
In the lawsuit the mother alleged the Defendants intentionally misled the court, fabricated evidence against her, and hid exculpatory evidence. She also alleged that caseworkers withheld information from the judge regarding the emotional distress of the children. On March 3, 2010, after a seven-week civil trial, the jury found the Defendants liable for violating the mother's parental rights and violating the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. She was awarded 4.9 million dollars. The jury also awarded her an additional $500,900 in punitive damages. The large settlement was intended to 'send a message' to Child Representatives, divorce lawyers and court appointed psychologists. It was reported that the child psychologists went bankrupt and lost his license to practice, along with the other lawyers and the Ex.

15 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Your Daily

3/12/2010 03:49:11 pm

Commitment to Winning No matter how long it takes

3/12/2010 03:53:22 pm

Don't re-creat the wheel. Model your complaint after one similiar that "won"! It has been a long time in comming but at long last a legal "bomb" is going to drop this week.

Patience

3/12/2010 04:21:52 pm

I waited 1735 days for this week to come. I have been counting each minute of each day just like Eisenhower counted from Dec 7, 1941 until June 6 1945 to invade Nazi-Germany at Normandy Beach on D-DAY.

3/12/2010 08:01:17 pm

No one cares Leo, No one cares.

child rep

3/12/2010 08:36:34 pm

Of course I sided with her. She let me fuck her, you dumb sap, you were had from the start

original thought

3/12/2010 10:44:47 pm

just copy someones work, huh Leo. Your not capable of an original thought. However "N" is certainly right, no one cares.

Get Real

3/13/2010 05:19:42 am

Kind of sucks to be you, Leo. You are going to prison. That is the only conclusion supported by the facts. All of the other stuff you post on this blog is just the rantings of a sociopathic liar.

Blah, blah, blah. Everyone knows you are a joke. You are a cartoon. A punchline that others toss around for their own amusement. Including your family and anyone familiar with your legal "career."

64-years-old and this is as good as it gets for you. It sucks to be you, Leo.

The Bull

3/13/2010 06:26:56 am

By the way Leo. We understand that Russell was a cuckold also. Do you really know who your father was? She says you always complained you didnt know

Child development center link

4/11/2012 03:38:38 pm

I think the things you covered in the post are quiet impressive, good job and great efforts. I found it very interesting and enjoyed reading all of it...keep it up, lovely job..

Enough

3/13/2010 09:03:31 am

Would someone please reach out to Mr. Palmer and have him make this nut job extinct already? Enough is enough.

Upfront

3/13/2010 03:32:32 pm

No one care huh? When the papers are served this week on the targets, you will hear the "screams" from the Daley Center all the way out to Arlington Heights. It's tightly packaged, smoothly muscled, rather like an Olympic swimmer. Everything about is taut, athetic and the "15" counts are guarrented to nock your socks off!

AAA

3/14/2010 01:50:13 am

That's right, Upfront (Leo), nobody cares. The only thing you're an expert in is making yourself look like
an idiot in every aspect of life. What's the running total now? Over a million dollars in judgments and sanctions against you?

And quit fantasizing about the men's Olympic swim team. You're starting to sound like the Liberace of frivolous lawsuits, you little fairy.

Reality

3/14/2010 04:49:27 am

Does anyone care about anything Leo says or does? No.

Does anyone care that Leo faces justice for his lifetime of fraud and judicial abuse? Yes, lots of people.

Once again, Leo demonstrates he lacks the intellectual capacity to identify even the most elementary distinctions. Go ahead and continue to play the part of Village Idiot, Leo-- it's the only thing you do well.

Face

3/16/2010 05:11:49 pm

Funny defendants who are sued for $100 million have to tell their insurance companies, if they have insurance. Attorney who carry mal practice insurance need only be sued "twice" for their insurance carries to drop them. Attorneys who have Attorney Disciplinary Complaints filed against them have only the "rest" of their lives to explain them, even if unsucessful, to new employers, insurance carriers, judicial selection committees, it became a "stain" that can never be washed away whether they are convicted or not. The only thing a lawyer has after all is his "reputation". What you don't comprehend is that the mere filing of a
Complaint is a fait accompli

You are a Moron

3/17/2010 03:48:21 pm

Leo (Face), you grow more delusional every day. You are such a joke, there are no repercussions whatsoever to any complaint you file with anyone. All you have to do is say the words "Leo Stoller" and whip out any of the dozens of court opinions detailing what a lowlife con artist you are. Quit kidding yourself, Leo. Nobody worries about you-- they just laugh at you.

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics