PHOENIX LAW FIRM OF TIFFANY & BOSCO TO BE ADDED IN CHICAGO RACKETERRING LAWSUIT

3/27/2010

CHICAGO-(AEAE)- THE ARIZONA LAW FIRM OF TIFFANY & BOSCO REFUSED TO RESPOND TO A DEMAND LETTER TODAY BY 6:00PM Thursday. A spokes person for the law firm McHenry stated that attorney Leonard McDonald would respond. Email and faxes were sent to the Phoenix Arizona law firm but they failed to respond. Illinois Civil Racketeering law suit involving Bank of American, Country Wide Financial will be amended to add the necessary parties, Defendants, the law firm of Tiffany & Bosco, Mark Bosco individually and Michael A. Bosco individually. In addition, the Arizona firm of John Hall & Associates, Bryan Hayes, and the real estate broker Jim Sexton will be added to the Chicago fraud and conspiracy case. Each one of these parties failed to meet the dead line to respond.

8 Comments

1 link

3/26/2010 01:13:02 am

I predict Bosco won't be recommended by AEAEAEA

Reality

3/26/2010 03:46:32 am

Not recommended by AEAE? The hateful little runt with an internet connection and an organization of one. Nobody cares, Leo. You really are getting desperate. Have fun in prison, fat boy.

Bosco

3/26/2010 06:42:44 am

You don't really think anyone would dignify one of your "demand letters" with a reply, do you?

Annals to the Practice of Law

3/27/2010 03:55:12 am

Tell it to the judge

Who Cares about attorney recomendations?

3/27/2010 04:07:49 am

When someone is look for an attorney they will "Google" that attorney's name. If they find an "unqualified" recomendation they will choose a different lawyer. That's who cares about attorney "ratings". The only thing any lawyer has is his "reputation". Once that is "gone" they have "nothing!"

Leo the Idiot

3/27/2010 04:22:32 am

Kind of ironic-- when you Google(tm) "Leo Stoller", the only thing you find are court documents after court documents detailing what a lowlife fraud you are. Give it up Leo-- your days of "harassing legitimate actors for the purpose of extracting a settlement amount" are over. Nobody will ever give you a dime again. Do the world a favor and stick a gun in that slanderous mouth of yours.

Core of the matter

3/27/2010 02:36:04 pm

The Illinois Cook County Sheriff is not laughting, neither is Bank of America, Wells Fargo Financial, 25 attorney defendants et al.
An entity that pounds away for 40 years seeking justice is bound to get a little "negative" press. But under our constitution even drug dealers are entitled to their "day(s)" in court(s).

Lady Justice

3/28/2010 05:26:13 am

"Negative press," Leo? Really, that's what you call scores and scores of actual court findings and court documents signed by real judges describing you as nothing but a parasite who forges, perjures, lies and is an all-around scumbag? Don't flatter yourself, fat boy. That's not "negative press"-- that's called the historical record of your so-called "legal career."

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Categories
Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation. AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website.

RSS Feed

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics