PUTIN APPOLOGIZES TO THE POLISH GOVERNEMENT FOR SENDING AN AGING SOVIET JET LINER TO PICK UP THE POLISH GOVERNEMENT, “SHOULD HAVE SENT NEWER PLANE”.

4/12/2010

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-Polish-Russian relations had been improving recently after being poisoned for decades over the massacre of some 22,000 Polish officers in and around Katy forest.
Russia never has formally apologized for the murders but Putin's decision to invite the Polish Government and provide a free flight with a Russian Jet liner, which was just about to be moth balled in order for the Polish Governmental Officials to be able to attend a memorial ceremony earlier this week, in the forest where the Russians had previously slaughter 22,000 Polish Officers. The Polish Government saw this as a gesture of goodwill toward reconciliation.
Putin invited the Polish-Government “free” to come to a ceremony honoring the deaths of the 22,000 Polish Officers that the Russians slaughtered during the second world war. Putin invited the President of Poland President Lech Kaczynski and his wife Maria. along with 98 other Polish Governmental officials, all of whom supported the U.S. Installation of the U.S. nuclear missile shield. According to one source Putin upon learning of the crash of the aging Russian airliner, that he sent to pick up the Polish government officials, at no cost to them, which ended up killing the top levels of Poland's military, political and church elite Saturday, killing the Polish president and dozens of other dignitaries, who had previously supported the American Anti missile defense system that was to be installed in Poland, said, I should have sent a newer plane . . In any event I don't believe that the “next” government of Poland will so easily support any “new” U.S nuclear missile installation in Poland or any other former eastern block country. One Ukrainian official said, “His government is not crazy enough to ever get on any plane that was sent by Putin to take them any where. Only the Polish Government would do that!”

7 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Bionic Bob

4/10/2010 04:10:12 pm

I see your waisting your time again tonight, working for your lawyers. Bionic “Bob”
The Russians are to brutish for me. I would rather see my victims economically wiped out. First your great credit will go. Than your lawyers will eventually sue you and finally you will be foreclosed and thrown out on the street. That's a lot more fun than blowing up an airplane with a lot of people in it, don't you think?
I work on that peaceful, lawful outcome for you each and every hour of every day

Reality

4/10/2010 05:42:55 pm

Dream on, fat boy. Your ex-wife is more than taken care of, and your sociopathic blather is nothing but a source of amusement for anyone who reads it. While you wallow in your rathole spewing hate with your little blog that is your entire life, everyone else is soaking up life's pleasures. You are a loser in every sense of the word, Leo. You are a fat little circus midget who is going to die broke, alone, and will be remembered, if at all, as a complete joke. Too bad, fat boy, you were given the gift of life and wasted all of it.

The Bull

4/11/2010 01:41:00 am

More then taken care, you got that right. Hey fat boy she doesn't have any lawyer fees, get that? none many are doing it for fun out of hatred for you a few others have a different way of getting paid.

the noose started tightening on thursday didn't it? Division 10 is wating for you.

The Hunter

4/11/2010 03:30:47 am

You can spew all the vile you want, fat boy, but there is only one outcome here: You are going back to jail, and most likely, your nights will be spent being serenaded by the Aryan Nation gangbanger who just got done pounding away on that fat ass of yours.

4/11/2010 12:24:18 pm

It always warms the cuckolds of my heart to see such devotion to a perjurer, a fraud, thief, adulterer, lier, co-conspirator and racketeer. Anyone who continues to support you in court can expect to be charged with subordination of perjury, aiding and abiding, conspiracy, indirect criminal contempt and civil racketeering. Count on it.

Loser Clown Leo

4/11/2010 02:01:20 pm

Bionic Bob (Leo), you really have to get yourself on the right meds, sport. You're living in a fantasy world. You are a punchline. A joke. A minor annoyance, a pimple on the ass of the legal community. Have fun in jail, fat boy.

adidas store link

6/10/2010 06:15:29 pm

I support the upstairs, I think so, too. www.sec-torand.com And I like some in leisure style,I often buy in the store , what do you think?

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics