SATURDAY NIGHT 3:00AM DRAFTING A 100 MILLION DOLLAR RICO LAWSUIT THAT WILL BE FILED MONDAY

3/1/2010

CHICAGO-(AEAE)- HE HAD INFORMED A VERY LARGE LAW FIRM AND TWO OF ITS ATTORNEY THAT IF THEY INTERFERED WITH THE SUBJECT property that he would "sue them for $100 million dollars. It is 3:05 am. The complaint was being drafted all day Saturday. It will be polished and filed Monday morning. They and there clients are name and will be sue for over $100 million. It should be "clear" that after 35 years of litigation that He "never" threatened litigation. If he says he is going to sue you, he "sues" you. The case will be filed Monday morning. Stay tuned to learn who are the defendants. The same attorneys have an Indirect Direct Criminal Contempt Petition filed against them.

24 Comments

Stamina

2/27/2010 05:50:47 pm

Can't waite to Monday Morning

stollerexposed.blog.com

2/28/2010 09:21:00 am

yeah whats that one of 4 current rico 100 million lawsuit! Yawn. You suck. Go have a cockmeat sandwhich and get back to us when you know the law....

Sound Off

2/28/2010 01:54:10 pm

Nothing focuses the mind like a 100 million dollar law suit

Knowledge Exhange

2/28/2010 02:09:42 pm

Who's counting? The more there are the more like "one" will stick, all it takes is just "one" to stick to become the next Mr. Trump II.
Where ever you are there will always be another time and another place, that why it always pays to "paint" with many colors.Every door is both an entrance and an exit.

Stoller = Dirtbag

2/28/2010 02:41:07 pm

How telling. Stoller fantasizes he'll become rich not by virtue of skill or hard work, but in the hopes that one of his frivolous lawsuits is a lottery ticket. Of course, all they have netted him to date is over a million dollars in judgments AGAINST him, court decisions finding him to be a vexatious litigant who has committed perjury and fabricated documents, court orders barring him from filing anything in federal court, the scorn of judges and lawyers and the hatred of his children. Hopefully Stoller will do the world a favor by choking to death on that cockmeat sandwich.

stollerexposed.blog.com

3/1/2010 12:58:44 am

Not to mention his post are not even making a little sense.

Newsmaker

3/1/2010 01:28:10 am

Traffic is up

The Hammer

3/1/2010 04:17:39 am

Newsmaker (Leo)- Gosh, traffic is up. And all you have to do is make yourself look like the biggest moron in the world, Leo. Unfortunately for you, that's the only talent you have. It's funny (and ironic)-- all you have to do is google Leo Stoller and everyone knows you are a psycho loser. Have fun in prison.

The Bull

3/1/2010 04:54:39 am

I got her again last night, you ought to hear the stories she tells about you, Leo.

The Hammer

3/1/2010 05:50:56 am

Oh.... Google(tm)... You fucking loser, Leo.

Dawn

3/1/2010 07:17:58 am

Your First Class
trailer trash
will give you
a well deserved
deadly skin rash!

Stamina

3/1/2010 07:28:40 am

What you don't think "drafting" a multi count racketeering complaint against a slew of lawyers and a multi billion dollar opponents is not hard work?

You know how long it takes just to make photo copies of the documents?

You know how heavy the copies are to take down town to file them?

You know how difficult it is to actually nail the attorneys with service of process, when they see you coming they start running?

You know how many court appearences it takes to prosecute a multi count RICO action?

You know how many years it takes through appeals and appeals to win one of these things?

How many depositions you have to take?

What you think thats not "work"?

Without even having to think

3/1/2010 07:33:26 am

For him that pure "fun"!That's not work! Especially the chasing down the parties who start to "run" when they see his
FACE

Casimir Polaski

3/1/2010 12:57:10 pm

At least I know that court is closed today. Maybe you can file your next failure tomorrow.

Stoller = Dirtbag

3/1/2010 02:13:45 pm

We've all seen your pleadings, Stoller. They are devoid of any signs of work, thinking or coherency. They evince only the delusional ramblings of a loser who will die alone in his rathole or getting stuffed by his cellmate.

From the Rathole

3/1/2010 02:43:48 pm

Once a pleading is filed in any court. That's a ticket to force an opponent to defend it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. So I'm told.

Ray DeGardenia

3/4/2010 07:45:31 am

Why don't you just sue the human race for all the money in the world?

Step it up

3/4/2010 08:37:47 am

I like you Gardenia, we're split the recovery!

Air Jordan link

3/2/2011 02:47:26 pm

No one would have doubted his ability to reign had he never been emperor.

comprar reductil link

3/7/2011 05:59:22 am

We've all seen your pleadings, Stoller. They are devoid of any signs of work, thinking or coherency.

preorder staxyn link

3/25/2011 06:39:06 pm

An acquaintance of mine and I have described this subject. Your site article help resolved our question. I'll keep reading more posts! Thank you.

staxyn link

3/30/2011 01:00:40 am

Good lyrics. Well written phrases.

staxyn link

3/30/2011 03:55:31 am

It is a good reminder that we must always brush our teeth 3 times or more each day. Good article.

preorder stanyx link

3/30/2011 05:05:19 am

I want to be a doodler. How can I start?

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Categories
Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation. AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website.

RSS Feed

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics