SECOND REQUEST FOR SUBSTITUTION OF JUDGE GERALD BENDER MEETS WITH A FRIVOLIOUS MOTION TO DISMISS

10/5/2010

_ CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE FILING OF A SECOND MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE GERALD BENDER MEETS WITH A FRIVILIOUS MOTION TO DISMISS AND SANCTIONS .”Petitioner moves this Court to dismiss with prejudice the frivolous, unwarranted and harassing petition entitled “Second Motion for Substitution of Judge Gerald C. Bender and for sanctions for the filing of a false, frivolous and unwarranted pleading in violation of Supreme Court Rules...even if the allegations in the pleadings and affidavits by the Respondent are viewed as true, which they are not.” It is obvious that the Petitioner does not view the conduct of a judge who fails and refuses to hear an noticed motions from April of 2010 to the current date, as grounds to disqualify a judge. The Petitioner does not obviously view Judge Gerald C. Bender clear violations of the due process rights of the respondent, who has appeared before Judge Gerald C. Bender for over 6 months and in those six months Judge Bender has refused to entertain any motion filed by the Respondent. According to the Petitioner this is the conduct of a fair and impartial judge and the suggestion that the Respondent should attempt to seek a change of judge should be subject to sanctions. How reasonable? What the Petitioner's attorney fails to tell the court that his legal training came from a Russian law school that taught that a Respondent should just be grateful that he doesn't just get a bullet in the back of his head while sitting in a court room.

This is your new blog post. Click here and start typing, or drag in elements from the top bar.

6 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Scum

10/4/2010 04:58:50 pm

Yeah, uh-huh, good luck with that, douchebag. You have a better chance of winning a bikini contest on Spring Break, Fat Ass.

Mr. Rubber

10/4/2010 07:06:42 pm

When I read this one you posted fat ass I really am sorry I had a hole in my when that bum picked me out of the garbage the night he and your mother made you.

PS When I was in that big slimy hole it really really smelled. Chris sake didnt she ever wash?

Wow

10/5/2010 06:09:51 am

Sounds like Mr. Rubber had a hard time of it, so to speak.

Bu the matter at hand is you and judge Bender.

Why would anyone want to see a dirtbag like you treated fairly?

As for the motion you can count on getting your petition dismissed, all the judges hate you. There is no justice for you piggy, get used to it. Everyone lets you squak and strut then your crap gets tossed......just like a dirty rubber.

Dissed by S.Ct. - AGAIN!

10/5/2010 07:20:47 am

I see that the Supremes have denied another of your petitions. This one must hurt because it was from the Seventh Circuit's filing bar sanction and the holding that you are a perjuror.

How's that PayPal donation button working for ya'?

Derelect

10/5/2010 07:42:44 am

Way to go, Fat Ass-- tossed out of another court, were you? Maybe you can claim to be a squaw in the Oneida Indian Nation and head up to Wisconsin to get thrown out of the tribal court.

Father

12/31/2010 02:30:50 am

Obviously some people have not experienced Judge Bender's wrath. It is probably just that he is in his new courtroom. He can no longer tell a father he only needs to see his child once a year. Direct quote from the not so honorable judge gerald c bender. May he be tormented in hell forever.

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics