SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ORDERS APPELLEE PURE FISING INC TO RESPOND TO STOLLER JURISDICTIONAL MEMORANDUM

11/17/2009

Lance G. Johnson Esq

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS HAS ORDERED Appellee to file a response to Stoller's Jurisdictional Memorandum by Novermber 24, 2009. Stoller appealed a Northern District of Illinois Judge William J. Hibbler decision granting Pure Fishing's motion to dismiss. Stoller never received the Pure Fishing Motion to dismiss. Dispite that fact Judge Hibbler granted the Pure Fishing Motion to Dismiss. Stoller filed a motion for reconsideration which was denied by Judge Hibbler. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeal sue sponte order Stoller to file a Jurisdictional Statement. Stoller went back before Judge Hibbler and the Judge stated that his order was final and appealable. Now the Seventh Circuit wants to hear from Pure Fishing. Lance G. Johnson from the law firm of Roylance, Abrams, Berdo and Goodman represents Pure Fishing. Stoller moved to disqualify Johnson for abusing the legal system by avoiding service of process of a criminal contempt summons. Johnson who has billed Pure Fishing Inc over $450,000 for legal work performed in Illinois has denied in a 100 million dollar Illinois defamation case that Stoller has filed against that Illinois Courts do not have personal jurisdiction over Johnson because he has little contact with Illinois.

11 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Chase Melvin

11/16/2009 07:27:45 pm

Sound like the appellate court wants more than Leo's side of the story. Can you blame it?

fed watcher

11/16/2009 07:47:05 pm

Leo has bigger problems with the federal courts coming. Leo's not talking about what he's been ordered to do. The noose is slowly tightening Leo. Suicide might be an honorable option for you

Anon

11/17/2009 11:44:06 am

Whoa, Leo, a response has been ordered? That's unprecented. I'm sure that means you're going to get your very first victory in the 30 years you've been bringing bogus lawsuits. Oh, sorry, scratch that. My chemical imbalance that you like to write about must have been acting up to even think you might win.

Perry Mason

11/17/2009 12:22:55 pm

Only a total boob like Stroller would fail to comprehend the contempt and disdain with which the courts view a vexatious litigant like himself. If Stroller thinks a court would ever rule in his favor in light of his history, he is completely delusional.

Stranger than fiction

11/17/2009 05:04:12 pm

Stoller is holding in his hand today 4 Illinois Appellate court decisions granting motions, all of which were in his favor...can you imagion that...what must have those justices been on...I wouldn't bet my career on the possibility that a court would never rule in the favor of my opponent....

Otis Winkler

11/17/2009 07:02:13 pm

Leo: how goes the 7th Circuit's investigation of you? You haven't mentioned the Special Master's report issued on November 16th in Appeal No. 08-4240? Why don't you publish a copy so we can all see how well you are doing in the courts?

11/17/2009 09:25:29 pm

Stroller, have you ever heard the expression that "even a blind squirrel sometimes finds an acorn?" Without any more information you response lacks any credibility, just like you.

Syntax

11/18/2009 01:15:22 pm

Isn't it Squirrels season?

11/18/2009 02:12:28 pm

Syntax/Stoller, blind squirrels more typically get run over. Just like you.

Funny Farm

11/20/2009 01:38:41 pm

Have you ever seen a black squirrel?

adidas store link

6/10/2010 06:14:58 pm

I support the upstairs, I think so, too. www.sec-torand.com And I like some in leisure style,I often buy in the store , what do you think?

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics