STEVEN R. SMITH, MICHAEL WERICH > SPECIFIC ATTORNEY EXCLUSION ENDORSEMENT

5/13/2010

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-TO ALL OF THOSE ATTORNEYS AND OTHERS WHO ARGUE THAT THERE ARE NO CONSEQUENCES WHEN A LAWYER IS SUED CONSIDER THIS. The ISBA MUTUAL ATTORNEY INSURANCE COMPANY asks each attorney of a firm the following question. “During the past 5 years has any claim been made against: Applicant or a predecessor firm, any current member of Applicant or a predecessor firm; or to your knowledge, any former member of Applicant or predecessor firm? Yes No.” “Is any current member of applicant aware of any circumstance or incident that may result in a claim or suit Yes No”. If the answer is Yes. ISBA Mutual issues a policy to a law firm, but specifically excludes a certain attorney(s) from coverage. Under the “SPECIFIC ATTORNEY EXCLUSION ENDORCEMENT PROVISION. IT IS AGREED THAT THE POLICY IS AMENDED TO EXCLUDE THE FOLLOWINGT ATTORNEYS. The consequences of an attorney being sued a number of times can be “career ending”, according to a University of Chicago Law Professor. The law firm of Bryan Cave LLP, senior partner Steven Russell Smith and his “bag man” Michael Werich who have been sued for fraud, conspiracy, Civil Racketeering THREE times in the last 3 months think it is really “funny” according to one source and will not effect their careers one bit. According to one source Bryan Cave LLP, Steven R. Smith and Michael Werich can anticipate being named in several more complaints within the next month. Their failure to report that to their Firm's Bryan Cave LLP insurance carrier will result in the possibility of their firm losing all of their insurance. Bryan Cave LLP would not return calls regarding this story.

SIDEBAR: Today was the second time that attorney Steven R. Smith sent his “bag man” Michael Werich to court without him.

9 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Reality

5/12/2010 03:55:27 pm

And then there is addendum that you fill out regarding the lawsuit. In your case, fat boy, you simply explain that the lawsuit was filed by a moron who the courts describe as a perjurer, forger, liar, and all-around idiot. Takes about a half hour to dispose of that issue. But you wouldn't know that's part of being a lawyer with a thriving practice that deals with thousands of people over the course of a career, dumbass, because you have never been a lawyer and aren't qualified to work as a bathroom attendant at a law firm. Explaining away a small percetage of nut jobs like you is just part of the business.

That's all you got, Leo? Really? You really are getting desperate, Fat Boy.

Muscle Head

5/12/2010 04:06:15 pm

What do you think the other 30 lawyers that are being sued think? What do you think they and their partners who will be named in additional law suits during the rest of this year would say? Any way just hav'in a little fun, nothin wrong with dat? Right?

Real Funny

5/12/2010 04:09:50 pm

There is nothin more funny than watching their faces when they appear in court as defendants

hahahaha

5/12/2010 06:34:38 pm

Blah hahahaha what is really going to be funny, fat boy blahhahahahaha is the look on your face haha
hahaha when your gangbanger cell mate hahahaha
who hasn't touched a woman in two to five years ha
hahahahaha kind of like you blahhahaha starts
playing motorboat with those man boobs of yours
blahhahahahahaha blahhahahahahaha

blahahahahaha

5/13/2010 01:00:16 am

yeah, no kidding. what bra size are you wearing these days, Leo? C'mon, you know, with that fondness you have for dressing up as a woman. 34c? 34d? You really should consider eating a salad once in a while, fat boy. blahhahahahah
Blahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

fool watch

5/13/2010 01:24:10 am

As big as that law firm is they probably like others of their size self insure throu a pool created by the mega firms.

You Leo are to ignorant to even know such a pool of funding is routinely done. Idiot.

Click here. link

5/13/2010 02:02:55 am

Mental Illness is no joke.

The Freak Show

5/13/2010 03:24:05 am

Beating you up physically gives no satisfication since my all state high school wrestling Championship victory. Even after breaking my opponents back he just goot better in 3 months.
But exposing you for the "fraud" that you are and distroying your reputation, you name, your credit, your ability to get employment, to support yourself to find a suitable mate, to be scorned every where you go for the rest of your life and your offsprings lives, now were talking about a real satisfication, and a goal worth obtaining.
If I merely beat you up and broke your back, you would get over it, that would bring me No pleasure whatsoever. So I must decline your offer for now

discount bape shoes link

6/7/2010 06:39:37 pm

I am quite agreen with the write's says about the experiencial knowledge of better living.For home improvement I have glance those sits.I found they benifit for life. I want to buy something to home use. Hope you give me a good views
www.oche87.net

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics