STOLLER APPEALS ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE DENNIS PORTER'S DECISION EFFECTING FREE 'SPEECH'

11/13/2009

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER APPEALED ILLINOIS JUDGE DENNIS PORTER'S DECISION CONTEMPT DECISION FOR THE PUBLICATION OF SPEECH ON THE INTERNET. The U. S. Supreme Court in 1996 issued a decision in ACLU v. Janet Reno stricking down the Child Indecent Act in support of "free" Speech on the Internet. Stoller has appealed to the Illinois Appellate Court, First District and is confident of a reveral. The Illinois Appellate Court needs to establish standards for Illinois Judges to follow when dealing with "free" speech issues on the Internet.

16 Comments

Appraiser

11/12/2009 10:14:45 am

Trial court judges have "no" respect for anyone who appears below them until that party appeals and reverses the court...it is for that reason it takes a life time to earn the respect of the judiciary...

Professor

11/12/2009 10:19:02 am

When ever a judicial decision goes against you, the sooner you appeal that decision the better you will feel...Rule Number one, file your appeal within "one" hour after the negative decision is rendered. Do not wait the thirty days and inform the court that his decision will go up on appeal...

ChilizGirl

11/12/2009 11:42:05 am

I can get Chili to post. I will promise him waves and cocktails. Then he will come West and I'll even break a few laws if it means getting him to sit down at the keyboard. No wonder Leo hates women so much-- we are always scheming.

This is all so interesting. First time ever I knew about this blog stuff.

How can anyone root against Leo? That is so wrong. That's like wishing ill on a short, fat disabled kid. That's not right.

It's going to be fun explaining to Chili that I did this. But you all seem so nice. Except, of course, you know who-- but you have to do your fair share to be sympathetic of the disabled.

Paraphraser

11/12/2009 01:51:07 pm

I heard that this blog was designed especially to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act

Anon

11/12/2009 04:12:32 pm

So, Leo, when do you get taken into custody? I'm sure your cellmates are anxiously waiting to reenact the pig squealing scene from "Deliverance" with you again.

Hondo

11/12/2009 11:46:51 pm

What happened in court this week Leo? Huh?? Were you found guilty of indirect criminal contempt? Were you fined and ordered to pay attorney fees?

Tell us Leo.

Court Room Observer

11/13/2009 05:22:58 am

The case is on appeal. The parties who brought the Indirect Criminal Contempt Proceeding for publishing "speech" on the Internet are now facing their own Indirect Criminal Contempt Proceeding, staring at perjury (Class 3 Felony), subornation of perjury(Class 4 Felony) and child ponography charges (class 1 felony). If found guilty they could go to jail from 1 to ten years....

Hondo

11/13/2009 06:27:35 am

Wasn't that porn evidence that was found on your computer? YOU can't imprison someone for bringing forth evidence of YOUR crimes.

Court Room Observer

11/13/2009 02:16:35 pm

"You certainly have had your fun. The therapist says that you will "never" settle. That you are perminately gone and irretrievable. That you don't believe that you will ever lose. That since you have watched him three times get locked up on account of your actions, you think it will happen again." When you see the charges lodged against you this week, asking for a sentence of 10 years, you will probably find it funny, but a jury may not. In any event, the gloves are off and work is going on 24/7 to have your two felony charges conclude with convictions. You were warned, you ignored the warnings. You choose this path, you started it, you filed "first" and you will only have yourself to blame when that "cell" door is slammed
in your face...tough love...

Hondo

11/14/2009 12:10:08 am

Interesting... No denial, only threats. How telling.

Court Room Observer

11/14/2009 02:57:07 pm

He is not going to argue his case before you...you can believe as he believed that "no judge would have locked him up for publishing "speech" on the Internet. You can delude yourself as he did, that no judge will lock you up for the serious charges (felonies) that you are being charged with, only to get surprised, only in your case he is seeking a 10 year sentence...but who knows a jury of your peers my find you not guilty or sentence you uo to 10 years... We will see what happens on Tuesday...litigation is a "blood" sport, you seem to love to play the game...may the best "man" win...tough love...

No one can forget Dec 7 1941 or 9/11

11/14/2009 03:22:18 pm

Just remember it is "never" going to end in 2010, 2012 it will go on forever..his oldest case still proceeding, dates from 1992...and he has "no"animus" toward those defendants...

Anon

11/17/2009 11:48:37 am

It will go on forever, Stoller? Don't think so. You will die the pathetic loser you have been your entire life.

The Final battle

11/17/2009 05:17:01 pm

People will always say,he took them all on big or small and... "When he goes, he's going down fighting.."just like the last scene in the movie the Sundance Kid..locked and loaded.....charge....

adidas shoes outlet link

6/7/2010 03:33:54 pm

Hhe article's content rich variety which make us move for our mood after reading this article. surprise, here you will find what you want! Recently, I found some wedsites which commodity is colorful of fashion. Such as www.sec-torand.com that worth you to see. Believe me these websites won’t let you down.

Dennis De Porter, retired judge of the Circuit Court of Illinois with Judge Dennis Porter of Cook County, Illinois

11/26/2020 04:26:08 pm

The names are similar. Retired Judge Dennis De Porter is an Illinois licensed attorney with, now, an office in Moline, Illinois.

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Categories
Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation. AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website.

RSS Feed

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics