STOLLER ASKS ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT TO VACATE UNCONSTITUTIONAL ORDER OF PROTECTION

2/8/2010

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ON NOVEMBER 25, 2008 ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE CAROL BELLOWS ENTERED AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL ORDER OF PROTECTION AGAINST STOLLER BARRING STOLLER FROM PUBLISHING “SPEECH” ON HIS “BLOG”. On June 8, 2009 Stoller was found guilty of violating this unconstitutional Order of Protection and was incarcerated for 37 days in the Illinois Cook County Jail until July 15, 2009 just for blogging in violation of Stoller's first amendment rights and in violation of Stoller's Civil rights under Section 1983. The case is now before the Illinois Appellate court. As a condition of the Order of Protection, Stoller was to refrain from engaging in any defamatory or demeaning behavior.A Order of Protection that prohibits a party from engaging in defamatory or demeaning communications clearly impinges on the Stoller’s first amendment right of free speech. See, e.g., Garrison v Louisiana, 379 US 64, 75; 85 S Ct 209; 13 L Ed 2d 125 (1964) (“The First . . . Amendment[] embod[ies] our profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials.”on in setting the conditions of and Order of Protection or a condition of probation. People v Winquest, 115 Mich App 215, 220; 320 NW2d 346 (1982). Stoller is preparing a Civil Rights law suit against all of the parties responsible for the false Arrest, false imprisonment which will be filed within 3 weeks.

8 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

competitor

2/7/2010 01:15:54 pm

No one thought New Orleans was going to win either

Stoller = Scum

2/7/2010 02:46:17 pm

Actually, moron, New Oreleans was favored to win. But I have a question for you, Stoller. When your fellow inmates are pounding away on you, do you still think of yourself as a woman?

And the Saints Come Marching

2/8/2010 12:10:41 am

Actually-- just like always-- Leo proves everyone else's point by his dimwit comparison with the Saints.

The Saints went 13-3 during the regular season against the best professional football teams in the world. For over the past decade, they have sought out the greatest players whose hard work, dedication and integrity would eventually lead to success. Their newest coach and organization dedicated themselves to getting extremely talented people who play the game the right way.

Leo, on the other hand, never won a regular season "game" in his whole life. In fact, the only truthful claim Leo can make is that he has had more judges, courts, individuals, and everyone else point out that he is a fraud, perjurer, forger, and all-around loser who will say or do anything, regardless of the truth.

Leo comparing himself to great champions like the Saints? What a joke. He's probably just upset he didn't set up an Internet scam to rob victims of Katrina (just like he tried to do with 9/11 victims.)

Leo the Loser-- have fun in prison, sport.

2/8/2010 12:21:55 am

And the only reason he files so many appeals (and has those laughed out of court as well) is because he has never won a regular season game. It's like whining to the referee-- EVERY SINGLE TIME-- that he deserves a review. The courts give him a review alright-- and reaffirm the original ruling that Leo is a lowlife dirtbag.

Stollerexposed.blog.com

2/8/2010 10:01:57 am

He also appeals to buy time and intimidate. Anyone can appeal anything. Now that the courts are on to him and he's being seriously investigated everyone knows his delay and threat tactics. It's kinda of ironic too that he continues to hang himself on this very blog. He just doesn't know it yet.

Curious

2/9/2010 04:48:04 am

And if, while your fellow inmates are pounding away, you decide that you like it, does that mean you're gay? Does the answer change if you don't report it because you're afraid they'll pound you to Taco Bell burrito filling and you let them do it again? How many times does it take for the Helsinki Syndrome set in?

2/9/2010 08:10:11 am

Oh my god stop I just got a visual......

Anon

2/9/2010 05:32:54 pm

Gay or not, Stoller does love himself some man meat. As another commentator has pointed out, there's no other explanation for why Stoller seems so determined to bring himself in close confinement with lots of sweaty men.

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics