STOLLER CHARGES MICHAEL T. ZELLER, JOHATHAN M. CYRLUK WITH AIDDING AND ABETTING ALLEGED TORT AND FRAUD ON THE COURT BY GOOGLE INC.

10/7/2009

THE EMPORER HAS 'NO' CLOTHS

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER HAS ALLEGED THAT ILLINOIS BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE RICHARD M. FOGEL ENTERED INTO A SCHEME WITH WASHINGTON D.C. ATTORNEY LANCE G. JOHNSON TO SELL THE STOLLER'S TRADEMARK ASSETS THROUGH A “NAKED” ASSIGNMENT AND/OR ASSIGNMENT IN GROSS AS WELL KNOWN TO GOOGLE INC'S ATTORNEY MICHAEL T. ZELLER. As a result of the August 20, 2007 “naked” assignment no valid trademark rights or other corporate assets were ever lawfully assigned to Lance G. Johnson “scam” entity called the Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse (SPTA).
The name SPTA is an oxymoron. Because SPTA was set up to defraud the Illinois Bankruptcy court and the Patent and Trademark Office according to Stoller's Position Paper filed in the Google Inc., v Central Mfg Inc Civil Rico Case No 07 CV 385. Jonathan M. Cyrluk from the Illinois law firm of Stetler & Duffy LTD 312-336-0299 filed a copy of a Permanent Injunction and Final Judgment as to Defendants Central Mfg Inc., and Stealth Industries Inc., on Sept 30, 2009 that was just served upon Stoller today. The “Final Judgment was signed by Michael T. Zeller and Lance G. Johnson knowing that the underlying assignment dated August 20, 2007 written by Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel is a “naked” assignment, invalid on its face and did not assign any lawful trademark rights or corporate assets to SPTA/Lance G., Johnson. What we really have here is a repeat of Hans Christian Anderson famous children's story the Emperor Cloths. But in this story everyone is pretending that Fogel's August 20, 2007 “naked” assignment of Stoller's assets was a “valid” assignment transferring all of Stoller assets to Lance G. Johnson when in fact the said August 20, 2007 Assignment was a “naked” assignment and no lawful assets were ever assigned to Lance G. Johnson as well known to Google Inc., their attorney Michael T. Zeller, Lance G. Johnson and Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel and Zeller's “new” bag man Jonathan M. Cyrluk. Mr. Cyrluk has the temerity to promote himself as the “big” defense attorney that defendants “white” collar criminals from the Federal Prosecution, yet he involves himself in a conspiracy to defraud Illinois District Court Judge Virginia Kendell along with Zeller, Fogel and Johnson according to allegations in Stoller's Positions Paper and Illinois Attorney Disciplinary Complaints. Legal Disclaimer: Zeller, Fogel, Johnson and Cyrluk are considered innocent of any charges until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

.

3 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Rita

10/6/2009 03:43:21 pm

When I was young my mother read me the Hans Christian Anderson Childrens story "The Emperor has "No" Cloths

Pinky Ferguson

10/6/2009 08:57:14 pm

Amazing cartoon, Leo! You are an expert "artist." At first I didn't "get" it, but then it "dawned" on me that Zeller has no cloths. I was confused, though, that you drew Judge Kendell as a man. Isn't Virginia a "man's" name? Maybe if you had drawn the "judge" with no cloths, that would have "answered" my question.

Bobby

10/11/2009 03:13:56 pm

THE EMPORER HAS 'NO' CLOTHS

CLOTHS = CLOTHES

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics