STOLLER FILES APPEAL BRIEF IN ELMWOOD PARK MALICIOUS PROSECUTION CASE

12/6/2009

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER WAS UNDER UNDUE INFLUENCE AND FORCED TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT TO DISMISS HIS MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, FALSE IMPRISONMENT 2007 LAWSUIT AGAINST THE VILLAGE OF ELMWOOD PARK, MAYOR OF ELMWOOD PARK, CHIEF OF POLICE ET AL. Stoller was unlawfully held in the custody of the Cook County Department of Corrections the first time on June 6, 2005 until June 8, 2005 on a "frivilious" domestic battery charge which was latter dismissed in Stoller's favor, giving rise to a malicious prosecution, false arrest and false imprisionment lawsuit. During Stoller latest "false" arrest and "false" imprisionment in the Cook County Jail for the "Crime" of publishing "Speech" on the Internet for 37 days, Stoller was given the opportunity for his "freedom" only on the condition that he sign a divorce settlement agreement and an a agreement to dismiss the Elmwood Park Case. The Elmwood Park Case was later dismissed as a result of Stoller's "coerced" agreenent to dismiss the Elmwood Park. Now the question posed to the Illinois Appellate Court is wheither a person, hand cuffed, in the custody of the Cook County Depart of Corrections, who is forced to enter into an agreement in order to obtain his freedom, can such an agreement be invalid based on the doctrine of "Undue Influence?" What is your opinion? You are invited to leave a comment or email Ldms4@hotmail.com

9 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships available
312-545-4554

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

Menelaus

12/5/2009 02:45:27 pm

Litigation is the province of men, do not grieve for those who's time have come

Gollum

12/5/2009 03:01:36 pm

I can see your on right now looking at me while I'm looking right at you right through your monitor which has a Resolution of 1280x1024. Your Browser IE 7.0 and your operating System is WinXP...

It has been very calm for you, so far you have gotten your way, but this game is not overby a long shot, you have "destoyed" yourself but do not even known it yet. You headed for your own personal Katrina...that storm is comming your way, can count on it, sweet dreams....

Mike Hunt

12/5/2009 08:43:31 pm

Leo, You are so fone of your little sayings. Here is one to think about.

"Fate is the hunter." Your fate in federal prison is near.

Ted

12/5/2009 10:48:14 pm

Why are you confusing criminal law's doctrine of undue influence with civil law's doctrine of settlement? Maybe you should get an actual lawyer who has gone to an actual law school. You might also want to double check the definition of "expert." I don't think it means what you think it means.

The Warden

12/6/2009 07:12:46 am

How's that case going up in Wisconsin where someone was actually idiotic enough to pay you $300 to be their "expert" witness? How many times did you perjure yourself in that case as well? Didn't you represent that you had been an expert in a bunch of cases when, in fact, the only thing that could be confirmed is that you are possibly the biggest moron in the history of American jurisprudence? And how did you find the idiot who was willing to pay you for your "expert" services? Was it through the Internet? Was it by using a tool of interstate commerce to perpetuate a fraud?

Gosh, Leo, it's just a matter of time?

So this has been your plan-- to go to jail twice this year, get banned from further filings in the 7th Circuit, wind up so broke you have to forge your daughter's signature in yet another fraud to try to get pauper status, and to have the U.S. Attorney investigate you for a laundry list of other fraudulent activities?

Give it up, Leo. You don't scare anyone and you never have. The only thing you have done is ensure that you have lived a completely wasted and meaningless life.

Hondo

12/6/2009 10:03:42 am

He sure seems to enjoy making veiled threats to his ex and bullying her with all his fraudulent legal BS. Yeah, a real tough guy. She made an excellent decision in kicking Leo to the curb.

12/6/2009 04:12:01 pm

He has made no threats to anyone. Anyone who knows him for 40 years knows that he is not in the business of threatening legal causes of action against party. Every cause of action that he has had, he will persue... until the "last court speaks". He sued his father, brother...no one is exempt unless of course there is "no" valid cause of action.... recently concluded a 92' case against a party that he had "no" anemias against.
Just remember if he says he is going to sue you, as sure as the sun will shine tomorrow he will sue you, no threat, you will be sued...I know him pretty well and he will sue you know... endlessly....currently he is merely preparing his case so that when he attacks the complaint will "stick"...just stay out of his way or you will get sucked into the vortex..upon reliable authority...

Leo Stoller is a joke

12/7/2009 04:48:08 am

Bring it on bitch! Your going bye bye!

stollerexposed.blog.com

Snarling

12/9/2009 03:13:57 pm

What some consider hell, he considers it home...weclome, make youself at home...for the next ten years...

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics