STOLLER FILES APPEAL OF JUDGE ELMER TOLMIRE DECISION TO THE APPELLATE COURT

12/4/2009

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER FILED HIS NOTICE OF AN APPEAL OF ILLINOIS JUDGE ELMER TOLMIRE WITH THE APPELLATE COURT. Judge Tolmire denied Stoller motion for leave to file a contempt proceeding on the Tenth Floor of the Chicago Daly Center Court House. This is an important appeal in that it is designed to have the Illinois Appellate Court give Illinois Judges guidence on how to permit parties to file contempt proceedings since there are none right now in the Illinois Cook Court Court System. There are judges, even chief judges in Cook County Illinois who have no knowledge of the proper procedure for permiting a party to file its contempt proceeding. ..See you in Court..Friday is a busy court hearing day...

18 Comments

Minas Tirith

12/3/2009 02:10:43 pm

Re-forge the sword..

Anon

12/3/2009 03:36:07 pm

Stoller is a drooling, sawed-off cretin, as his photo on this site accurately shows. The idea that this toilet bug could school anyone is pure delusion and fabrication. More prison time is in his future.

Pat McGroin

12/3/2009 11:31:42 pm

Another appeal means another Stoller loss. No suprise. Appeal Man will be busy on all of the Stoller contempt motions. Zzzzzzzzzzzzz wake me when the 7th Circuit puts Stoller away.Zzzzzzzzzzzzz

Mitch Cumstein

12/4/2009 12:25:13 am

stollerexposed.blog.com

Mike Hunt

12/4/2009 12:26:26 am

Sounds like the judges are fed up with Stollers antics.

3trdyu

12/4/2009 02:41:53 am

Please die, Stoller, you stupid fucking Fudd.

Phil DeGardinia

12/4/2009 11:36:19 am

Leo: will you be reporting soon on the order issued today by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, sanctioning you for a deceptive In Forma Pauperis filing and banning you for at least two years from filing any papers in any federal courts in the 7th circuit?

fed watcher

12/4/2009 12:22:38 pm

So little man (Leo is only 5 foot 6 with a small small penis we are told), kind of got screwed inthe 7th circuit and of course their findings will be used in all the state courts to stop your pauper filings, so your about done aren't you limp dick?

Anon

12/4/2009 02:48:40 pm

And the Seventh Circuit order referred the matter to the U.S. Attorney's office for possible prosecution of Stoller. Bye bye scumbag.

Mirth

12/4/2009 03:30:46 pm

According to one court watcher, "He's taken some hits in 41 years of practice, that's for sure, but he is "still" in the game..."
Isn't America a great place to live, where one court can try to deprive a person of their constitutional rights and another court's door, is wide open...Remember Babe Ruth held two records, the one for the most home runs and the one for the most "strike outs!"

fed watcher

12/4/2009 09:05:15 pm

Dear Mirth (Leo)

You have never practiced in those 41 years. Licensed Attorneys can make that statement. You are a wannabe twisted with hatred for the profession bevause you couldn't get into law school

Anon

12/5/2009 02:01:52 am

Leo/Mirth, logic is plainly not within your abilities. Striking out 100 percent of the time, like you do Stoller, hardly makes you Babe Ruth. It just makes you a loser.

The Bell Tolls for Thee

12/5/2009 04:34:49 am

The reason you are such an invalid in all your attempts to form a coherent legal argument is you don't possess the intellect to draw distinctions.

The difference between you and Babe Ruth is that he hit hundreds of home runs in addition to his strikeouts. The only thing you have ever done is strikeout. Little bit of a distinction there, chubs.

Great Eye

12/5/2009 10:20:29 am

The trap has been set, it is just a matter of time now before it catches you...Doesn't if feel good to be superior...Does it feel good that there is someone who is letting you feel that way.

Anon

12/5/2009 11:57:25 pm

Right, Leo/Great Eye. We are to believe that the Seventh Circuit's reinstatement of its filing bar against you and it's referral of you for criminal prosecution is some trap you've supposedly set. And that this is part of some scheme where you are allowing the rest of us to feel superior. Comically delusional of you, to be sure. But most all, it just confirms your staggering stupidity.

Have a great time in prison. We won't miss you. Nor will anyone else. It will be the perfect capper to your pathetic, cowardly life.

Agamennon

12/6/2009 04:49:01 pm

Now that must make you feel a lot better...how many people did you sue today...or how many appeals have you filed this week...or do you even know how to file an appeal...you surely never appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court..the best advise for you is just to stay out of his way or prepare to get run over...that according to Zeus

Dad

12/7/2009 01:09:08 pm

Funny thing is you would of made a great lawyer. Funny thing is you would of been an excellent lawyer. You just lacked the disipline. Also your mental illness for what you collect money from the gov every month hinders you. You crave attention that you never got years ago. You get your worth from regurgitating legal documents. You are void of any feeling. Your whole being is based on your self masterbating blog. Your swan song is here my friend. This is it for you. Enjoy it. Your children who are not knocking on your door to see you will have something to remember you by.

Anon

12/7/2009 01:53:29 pm

Stoller wouldn't have made a passable go as a toilet brush, let alone a lawyer. And, Leo, it is spelled Agamemnon. Some of us, unlike you, actually went to school and learned something. Some of us, unlike you, are actually admitted to practice before the Supreme Court. Your bluster is just that.

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Categories
Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation. AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website.

RSS Feed

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics