STOLLER FILES MOTIONS BEFORE THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS AND THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS TO DISQUALIFY LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS AND ALFRED GOODMAN

11/16/2009

Lance G. Johnson Esq.

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER FILES MOTIONS BEFORE THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS AND THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS TO DISQUALIFY LANCE G. JOHNSON FROM PRACTICING IN THE SAID APPEALS COURTS. Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman all law partners from the Washington DC law firm of Roylance, Abrams, Berdo and Goodman www.roylance.com were sued by Stoller for per se defamation, seeking 100 million dollars. For two years Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman have been dodging service of process. In pleadings filed by Johnson before Illinois Circuit Court Judge Kathy Flanagan, Stoller charged Johnson, Abrams and Goodman with “indirect criminal contempt!” Now the Johnson crowd have refused to accept service of Indirect Criminal Contempt Summons. Lance G. Johnson has filed an appearance in a Federal Circuit Court of Appeals case that Stoller has filed. Lance G. Johnson has also filed an appearance in an appeal that Stoller filed before the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago, Illinois. Now Stoller has filed two separate motions before the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals advising the court that despite the fact that Lance Johnson and his partners have been charged with “criminal” contempt in Cook County Illinois, Lance Johnson has refused to accept service of process and has thus brought the legal profession into disrepute. Stoller is requesting that both the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals and the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington disqualify Johnson, Abrams and Goodman from practicing law pending the resolution of their “criminal” contempt proceeding in Chicago, Illinois. As a member of the Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) attorney misconduct conduct should be called to the attention of each disciplinary commission in every state where an attorney is licensed to practice law. Johnson could not be reached for this article.

Legal Disclaimer: Johnson, Abrams and Goodman are considered innocent of all charges until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

David Abrams Esq.

5 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Court Room Observer

11/14/2009 03:01:50 pm

Garbage does not belong in a "court" room it belongs in the alley...Just remember it is "never" going to end until the all the garbage is in the alley...NEVER....this is only the beginning....

Anon

11/14/2009 10:41:50 pm

Stoller, go back to posing as a woman for your fake comments. Your made-up "Court Room Oberver" is just moronic. At least when you pretended to be a woman you were being true to yourself -- and, more importantly, getting yourself ready for your next stint in jail.

Internet Comment Police

11/15/2009 09:03:29 am

We have been tacking ANON for some time now, Anon is "all" over the Net and he says the same things, accusing usually men of being female. These types of comments normally come from a transgendered individuals who are jealous of normal males...Don't worry we will stay on Anon...who basicly is a good person with a warped personality disorder that is chemically challenged, not his fault...when he "comments" he's usually been off of his medicine for some time...If anyone has any information on this character please let us know by leaving us a comment..

Psych 101

11/17/2009 11:20:04 pm

Do you think he yet realizes that his comments are highlighted with a blue background despite the pseudonym? I guess the frenzy just takes over. That also probably explains the spelling.

Nona-Grandma in Italian

11/25/2009 11:58:19 am

I stumble onto this and find those posting here to be quite the Mansonistas, or more like the Chicago copsters that beat up on the bartender. Sure everyone has his/her day in court or hell. Take your pick...Wish you much enjoyment when you're there.

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics