STOLLER MOVES TO CONSOLIDATE LANCE G. JOHNSON INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT APPEALS

6/7/2010

CHICAGO-(AEAE)- STOLLER FILED SEVEN APPEALS OF THE LANCE G. JOHNSON ESQ. INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT APPEALS. Illinois Judge Gellespie dismissed Stoller Indirect Criminal contempt petitions against attorneys Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams, Alfred Goodman, Hayes Ryan, Chance Cooper and Ryan Brown. Stoller has now moved to consolidate all of the appeals in one so that the brief schedule can now proceed. The underlying 100 million dollar defamation case has been stayed by the Illinois Cook County Chief Judge Madoxx, who placed the case on the "Appellate Stay" Calender.

11 Comments

Your People Deserve the Best

6/5/2010 03:59:00 pm

Happy birthday to you too. You should get your present this Wednesday or Thursday by Certified Mail. My staff was kind enough to spend the entire Saturday, June 5, 2010 putting it together for you, your parents and all of your friends. I cannot think of anything that I would rather have done on June 5, 2010 than prepare your present for you, sweetie

Happy Dreams

hahahahaha

6/5/2010 04:33:52 pm

blahahahaha what are you wasting your paper for, fat boy? blahahahahahaha don't you know they use writing paper as currency in prison? blahahahahaha
you might want to save it up to bargain yourself out of a daily cornholing blahshahahahaha

The Bull

6/5/2010 09:13:38 pm

Your staff? Blahahahahahahahathats a good onebhlahahahah. heres a good one asshole. I gave her a 9 inch birthday present last night, she loved every inch of it was laughing about your equipment Blahahahaha

Staff

6/6/2010 04:37:38 am

I didn't want to add you name to the complaint that is being filed tomorrow, but the "staff" insisted. "Just for Laughts!"

To the staff

6/6/2010 05:02:14 am

Couldn't care less, dont have to do much anymore. Now the Judges are deleting you and dismissing youHAHAHAHA keep,wasting money asshole on filing fees. What a loser

Leo the Zero

6/6/2010 09:05:04 am

Dang, Bull, you give new meaning to the old addage
'when you mess with a bull, somebody is going to get the horn.' Leo, you little piss ant, you're so stupid that you don't realize everyone welcomes your big mouth and bullshit filings. It just means that every day is another nail in your coffin, another day closer to you being eradicated once and for all. And when you are homeless and wandering around State Street, don't be one of those guys who runs up to stoplights with a newspaper offering to clean the windshield for a dollar. I don't want your filthy little girly-hands touching my $140,000 Benz.

Repo Man

6/7/2010 04:01:27 pm

Facts:
1. Sue a lawyer twice in five years, he or she is "uninsureable". But you knew that, right?
2. No respectable law firm will ever hire you or any other lawyer who is "uninsurable"! You knew that right?
3. The good News, Uninsurable lawyers can get still get employment defending clients in "traffic" court.
4. Bad news, the repo man is looking for your car
5. Suing lawyers has consequences, whether the sue has merit or not, is unimportant to his mal practice insurance carrier. That's a Fact that you were unaware of. But that's ok you still very young and not expected to know the finner points of having a lawyers skin pealed back. Some lawyers never learn, you may be one of them.
6. By the way you were sued for RICO on Monday, your malpractice insurance carrier does not cover attorneys who are sued for RICO,(100 million dollars) sorry about that. But you knew that, because you know everything, right?
7. O I forgot, no lawyer cares about being named as a defendant in a RICO, action
8 Everyone you know was also named so you will have a "lot" of company. The judge was given a copy of the complaint today.
9. Of course you have nothing to "worry" about, until you fill out your next application for malpractice insurance and they ask you to identify all of the suits that have been filed against you in the last five years.
10. You might as well just turn that expensive car back to the bank so the repo man does not have to take it from you along with your home, boat and whatever else you own.

hahahahaha

6/7/2010 04:31:14 pm

blahahahaha blahahahahaha Leo, you are too much blahahahahahahaha you really are blahahahahaha
oh, no, it's Leo Stoller blahahahaha you little circus midget blahahahahahaha

Legal Malpractice Attorney

6/8/2010 02:01:33 am

I can assure you, Mr. Stoller, that any legal malpractice claims or bar complaints alleged by you are viewed the same way as your frivolous court filings-- nothing more than the sheer nonsense of someone who has attempted to make a living as a shakedown artist. As I understand it, you have never been an attorney, and therefore would not understand why it would be irresponsible to view someone like you any other way.

Juggernaut Rolls On

6/8/2010 08:46:58 am

"Shakedown" artist? All of his opponents have the right to counsel, due process, equal protection. Come on, "Shakedown" artist! Isn't that a little extreme coming from an unemployed lawyer who wishes he could represent someone he is suing.
All of his opponents, attorneys, have made a very nice living.
None of them are complaining. They all want more business, especially in these very difficult economic times.

Deadliest Sin is Greed

6/9/2010 03:18:28 am

Greed! not pride. Remember he doesn't get paid for what he does, he does it for the ....

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Categories
Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation. AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website.

RSS Feed

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics