Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

  • SUE THE BASTARDS
  • AEAE
  • AEJE
  • AEIPR
  • Rentamark
  • Archrive
  • PAGE 2
 

STOLLER TO APPEAL THE \"MACK\" FILING BAR TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

12/7/2009

8 Comments

 
Picture
Justice Roberts
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-FOR THE FIRST TIME IN HISTORY THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL IMPOSED A "MACK" FILING BAR OVER A DISPUTE INVOLVING A PAUPERIS PETITION FILED BY A PARTY IN A CHAPTER 7 BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDING. Stoller while in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy filed an appeal before the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The Bankruptcy Judge Jack Schmetterer had granted Stoller indigent.  Judge Virginia Kendell had granted Stoller motion to appeal in forma pauperis. The Illinois Supreme Court had granted Stoller the right 5 times to Appeal informa pauperis. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals denied Stoller the right to appeal informa-pauperis and was given a week to pay the filing fee. Stoller raised the money paid the filing fee. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals refered the case to Judge Brown to conduct an investigation as to "how" could  Stoller could claim to be a "true" pauper if he was able to come up with the filing fee for his appeal? Without concluding  her investigation Judge Brown filed a request for instructions before the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The $450 appeal fee issue was now a full blow Federal Court inquiry which appeared to involve $100,000.00 of dollars in attorneys fees, court fees to get to the bottom of "How could a pauper come up with a appeal fee when he claimed he was a pauper?" The Seventh Circuit choose not to allow Judge Brown to continue her investigation and on Dec. 4, 2009 issued a "Mack" filing bar against Stoller. Stoller will argue to the United Supreme Court that the "Mack" bar is unconstitutional and a violation of his Fifth and Fourteen Amendment rights and is an excessive punshiment which "never" has been imposed on any bankrupt party in the United States since its founding over the filing of a simple pauperis petition.  The Special master Judge Brown was especially interested in "How Stoller was able to pay for the "paper" he use to file his cases with?" The decision was issued by Justices frank H. Easterbrook, Richard A. Posner and Diane S. Sykes on Dec. 4, 2009 . It is important to note that the 7th Circuit "mack" bar does not apply to the 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 11th or any other Federal
Circuit Court. Stoller is free to sue in every other Federal Jurisdiction, until the U.S. Supreme Court rules on the Seventh Circuit decision which is the subject of Stoller Writ of Cert.  Ldms4@hotmail.com

8 Comments
Achilles
12/6/2009 04:41:46 pm

He has filed more Appeals with the United States Supreme Court than anyone else in Chicago where there are over 70,000 attorneys

Reply
Anon
12/6/2009 05:51:02 pm

More delusional jokes from the clown act that is Stoller. The Supreme Court too has restricted Stoller's filings before it because he is a vexatious litigant. Stoller's suggestion that the Supreme Court will step in and save him is laughable.

Reply
fed watcher
12/6/2009 07:35:56 pm

Buffoon

Reply
Stoller's Lost Brother
12/7/2009 12:18:59 am

When the Fed's lock you up you get sent far away unless you have unique family needs. Like I said, you will get sent far, far away.

Reply
No Name
12/7/2009 04:38:11 am

Hey, Christopher, is that you? Are you out of the slammer or are you still in Maricopa wearing pink underwear and sleeping in a tent?

Reply
Chris
12/7/2009 04:44:27 am

No I'm on in Chicago now. Back in jail for a lake county case. Leo can you bring me some nuts?

Stollerexposed.blog.com

Reply
Stoller's Ghost
12/7/2009 05:49:28 am

Doesn't Stoller realize that judges talk between themselves? With his reputation, there is no way he will prevail.

Reply
Grand Jury????
12/7/2009 06:20:44 am

Hmmm, Easterbrook refers it to the US Attorneys office? Does not look too good for Leo. Should be an easy case considering the evidence obtained by the Magistrate. Considering his past conduct and probability that Leo will not cooperate nor admit to the charge, Leo could be looking at some real time in a federal institution near you. Once convicted, Leo would lose valuable rights, including the right to vote. The MCC is not very nice in the winter.

Stollerexposed.blog.com

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
    Internships not available now
    ​


     Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
    FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​
    YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
    Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
     The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
     Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that  supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
     The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
    LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. 
    The author(s)  graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. The Author(s)  are the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics experts  and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation  Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions.  AEAE, P.O.  Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
    312-545-4554
    Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE  Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
     "Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
    Litigation is the Air We Breathe
    Litigation is War,

    Welcome to the Front!"


     To Prove Defamation Case?
    What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm. 
    The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation 

    The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

    “[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
    AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

    ​AEAE has the legal  right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators,  business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE  18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

    VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

    DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.



    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    July 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    January 2015
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Categories
    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested  persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

    All
    Jewelry Frauds
    Scams
    Yellow Diamonds

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.