STOLLER TO CHARGE 6 LAWYERS WITH SEVERAL FELONIES MONDAY

10/18/2009

WHERE ALL OF THE SECRETS ARE KEPT

CHICAGO--(AEAE)-COMMENTARY--IT'S NOW 12:50am--there we more visitors to this blog today Saturday night/Sunday Morning, than most week days. Don't you people have something else to do, like sleep... I have always been amazed at how may people come here each night AM to see the next posting on this blog which most of you know is posted at about 12:30am to 1:00am. A few days ago I told a guy that he should start blogging. He said, "I don't have any time, I would have to blog at 1:00am each night." I told him that's when I blog. Why do I blog? I tell you why, when I was in college in the 60's I was the editor of my college newspaper the Exponent. Although I wrote for my paper and edited it I have always felt that I didn't right enough articles. Consequently, I feel the urge to make up for not writing enough back then....I write every day though...I have written every day since 1974 when I started my business. For the last 25 years I have spent my days, each day writing legal briefs, appeal briefs, motions, complaints, responses, I have written enough legal briefs to fill a warehouse and this week for example I am working three appeals, several complaints and responding to s slew of motions. Monday, I will file my Notice of Appeal in the Google Inc., case. I won my first appeal of Judge Virginia Kendell's decision. I expect to win again...
This week also is going to be very interesting, I will file felony charges against 6 lawyers Monday. Thursday, I expect to file felony charges against a bounch of other well deserving individuals....Last Friday, I spend the entire day in the Law Library. I researched the law and found everything I need to plead a good felony case against alot of bad lawyers...who think that they are very clever and can violate the law because they know the law better than any one else.
You know what the "law" library is, it's a supermart on how to indict someone. The standard of proof to charge an offense is called probable cause (PC) . This is a very low standard of proof, and in essence requires that there be reason to believe that a crime has been committed, and reason to believe that the person charged did it. These types of offenses are very capabale of destroying a person's reputation, even if they are never convicted of it. Whether PC exists in any particular case depends on the type of proofs that the prosecution have. . ... The moral of this story is not to commit felonies and not to make the government, any judge or lawyer or an expert on the law, mad enough to want to put you away, because they can do it if they are pushed hard enough...just go to your law library and see....I believe that every other type of reading is nothing but a waist of my time...

This is your new blog post. Click here and start typing, or drag in elements from the top bar.

3 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Jake

10/17/2009 04:30:48 pm

I just read the The Associate by John Grisham does that count?

Anon

10/17/2009 05:09:10 pm

I just have to say that Stoller looks mentally impaired in his photo above -- which is undoubtedly an accurate portrayal.

Jesse

10/18/2009 08:32:46 am

there we more visitors to this blog today...

huh?

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics