STOLLER TO RELEASE HIS LATEST BOOK ON APPELLATE PRACTICE

12/14/2009

STOLLER ON APPELLATE PRACTICE

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER SET TO RELEASE HIS LATEST BOOK ON APPELLATE PRACTICE. Stoller who has been engage in Appellate work for over 40 years new book strives to demystify the appellate process and assist lawyers in becoming more proficient at filing winning appeals. Stoller's new book providing case summaries, practice tips deals with recognition and preservation of error committed by lower tribunals, and the presentation of winning arguments concerning the clear error of the trial court judges. A practical manual on handling appeals and cases involving review of U.S. Supreme Court decisions

11 Comments

HECTOR

12/13/2009 02:04:53 pm

Knowledge is power...The "pen" is the strongest weapon in the world...

Phil DeGardienia

12/13/2009 06:19:09 pm

This is a joke, right? The only "pen" that you'll be remembered for is the State pen.

fed watcher

12/13/2009 10:46:22 pm

Oh good the copy right can be attached and sold to satisy a judgement. I'm sure it's worth ten dollars maybe more as a joke coming from a fool who has never won anything in court

Mike Hunt

12/15/2009 12:39:34 am

I'd love to hear Leo tell us how many copies he has sold of all his "publications." I'd bet we can count the total on one hand & that is being generous.

Home of the Galactically Stupid

12/15/2009 05:09:43 am

Leo, please publish a Curriculum Vitae with credible, identifiable information.

And then look up the law, oh, say, the Commerce Clause, for example. Then work your way back to fraud, look at how using a tool of commerce (that ought to keep your head normal and mushy) is treated by the feds, then look back on the continuous trail of, well, fraud you have left in your wake.

Has this been one long 9/11 scam, Leo? Oh, pardon, you got out of that one without admitting guilt. Don't think you'll be so lucky this time.

And a shout out to anyone who was ever stupid enough to pay you a dime for anything related to the law. There's one born every second.

Tug Speedman

12/15/2009 07:19:31 am

On December 4, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ordered that the Special Master’s report regarding Leo Stoller’s truthfulness be forwarded to the United States Attorney for consideration of whether Leo Stoller should be prosecuted for perjury. The Court of Appeals also ordered the Mack bar against Leo Stoller to be reinstated, directing the clerks in all federal courts within the 7th Circuit not to accept any papers submitted by Stoller. The court entered the orders after establishing Stoller had been deceitful.

Read the documents at: http://www.scribd.com/ChiliPalmer75

fed watcher

12/15/2009 07:32:15 am

undoubtedly the referral to the US attorney explains why alot of people have recently been interviewed by the FBI.

Stollerexposed.blog.com

12/15/2009 12:08:55 pm

Wow. I thought they just came to my home. FBI are scary when they show up at your door.

Mike Hunt

12/16/2009 02:45:04 pm

A great example of Leo's work here. http://www.scribd.com/doc/23340520/2-11-09-LeoStollerWorkProduct

I can't help but wonder if the book is equally as shabby. I ask, it that the work of someone with a masters degree? Would you hire this person as an expert witness?

Denethor

12/16/2009 02:57:32 pm

Vincit omnia veritas

Elron

12/17/2009 02:24:28 pm

I saw the Mack bar appeal that was filed on another site. It is unconstitutional on several grounds.

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Categories
Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation. AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website.

RSS Feed

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics