STRIPPERS WIN CLASS ACTION STATUS AGAINST AN EMPLOYER

1/1/2011

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-Strippers won class action status against employer who claimed they were independent contractors. In Hart v. Rick's Cabaret Int'l Inc., 09 Civ. 3043, Judge Koeltl found that the employer regulates every aspect of the exotic dancers performances and as such the strippers were employees. “The class certification could cover as many as 1,700 exotic dancers under New York Labor Laws §190 et seq., §650 et seq. and the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Lawyers for the plaintiffs are still proceeding with a collective action that could cover as many as 10,000 dancers throughout the country. Rick's Cabaret International (RCII) oversees 21 adult clubs nationwide, according to its website.” FULL STORY Court Certifies Class of Exotic Dancers in Action Over Unpaid Wages

SIDEBAR: Happy 2011 New Year, to the "Three detention Kids!" That are being held hostage for five years! Every week end they can't go any where. They are forced to sleep on the floor. They can only sit around and get "fat" while watching TV three to four nights a week! The battle to "free" the "Three Detention Kids!" has been joined and you will be Free one day soon, it doens't matter the cost, probably a cool million!. But your worth every peny of it! Hopefully this New Year 2011 will be the year!

7 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Leo the ZERO

12/31/2010 01:58:52 pm

Speaking of a million, Leo, did you every pay the million dollar judgement that the courts awarded to Pure Fishing after they won their counterclaims? Of couse not, you've been pleading poverty and filing for pauper-azzi status! Or the fees for George Brett, when he kicked your ass? Probably not, since your entire life was liquidated in the chapter 7 sale that the Pure Fishing case brought you.

$7,500 is all you were worth, Leo. Are you worth anything now? Evidently your family hates you, and won't have anything to do with you. Admit it, Leo. Why the veiled posts and pseudo secrecy! Succumb to the dark side, Leo, and just end it all. The waters of Lake Michigan are forgiving, and hide all sorts of secrets!

Turning Back the Clock

1/1/2011 05:37:00 am

What's a Judgment?

Reporter

1/1/2011 05:37:57 am

He's never paid a judgment in his life!

Assclown Leo

1/1/2011 07:21:44 am

Shut the fuck up, Leo, you little pussy. You might never have paid a judgment before, but as anyone who has been within twenty feet of your far ass knows, you've never paid a water bill either. Don't worry, asshole. You'll be getting three hots, a cot, and free showers for the next fifteen years or so, unless they carry you out in a pine box before then.

Jake

1/1/2011 01:49:42 pm

1/1/2011 01:51:22 pm

Such animosity... oops, better not use big words with all the morons in this thread!

Question?

1/2/2011 02:50:36 am

Who is Mike Nifong?

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics