SUPREME COURT RELUCTANT TO UPSET FIRST AMENDMENT PRECEDENTS NOTWITHSTANDING FUNERAL PROTESTS

10/8/2010

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-Supreme Court justices on Wednesday seemed reluctant to upset First Amendment precedents that protect even the most obnoxious speech from punishment,while expressing disdain for the virulent protests staged at military funerals by members of a Kansas church. Protests by members of the church -- who demonstrate at funerals and other events to promote their message that God is punishing America for its acceptance of homosexuality -- have triggered lawsuits and legislation in 43 states to restrict funeral protests. http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2010/10/08/patrick_torn_on_military_funeral_protests/

SIDEBAR-Yet bloggers can still be sent to jail for publishing speech on the Internet!

High Court Seems Reluctant to Overturn First Amendment Precedents in Funeral Protest Case

9 Comments

Loser

10/7/2010 04:35:10 pm

Hey, Fattie, you weren't jailed for "bloging" on the Internet. You were jailed in contempt for defying a court order. Quit whining about it already. Keep up the donation crap and all the other scheming and you'll have plenty of jail stints to whine about in the future. Get a job, Fat Ass. Quit embarrassing yourself. After 64-years of being a drain on society it's time to man up, you little pussy.

Hey Leo:

10/8/2010 03:35:40 am

Eat me

10/8/2010 03:36:41 am

fat fucking pig, liar, cheat fraud all around scum bag

The Tounge

10/8/2010 01:14:22 pm

I thrusted into her hard, she loved it

Degenerate

10/8/2010 02:00:08 pm

Sounds like someone was trying to spell the alphabet using their tongue.

Hey, Fattie, how are those contributions rolling in with the elections right around the corner?

What scam are you going to use that "Donate Now" button for after the election is over? Are you going to represent yourself as accepting donations on behalf of orphans in Sudan? Or how about soliciting donations for the loser-wannabe-lawyers old folks' home? Or maybe to protect the ice caps?

Go ahead, Fattie, give us a sneak preview so we can all dig into our wallets and use your website to contribute to your worthy causes. Get a job, you fucking degenerate.

NoFoolin

10/8/2010 04:41:17 pm

That steak and lobster tasted real good tonight at the "Fat Cat" on Broadway in Chicago. I passed ( שוואַרץ ) a shvarts in front of the restrauant with a cup. My friend look at me an said, "there are a lot of easier ways to make "gelt" than standing on a street corner. That dinner tasted real good for someone who is unemployed! There are ways to get people to just throw "gelt" at you. Why you need a little gelt?

Scum

10/9/2010 09:56:35 am

Yes, there are all kinds of ways to try and get people to throw "gelt" your way, Fat Ass-- so quit acting like a whiny bitch every time one of your scams blows up in your face and/or you go to jail. It's a good thing that there are judges out there who keep vermin like you from passing their lack of values onto their children.

Twisted

10/9/2010 04:58:37 pm

There're already trained!

Contest

10/9/2010 05:00:21 pm

Be the 100,000 visitor

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Categories
Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation. AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website.

RSS Feed

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics