THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A “HATE CRIME”

1/29/2012

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-”THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A Hate crime. NOBEL LAUREATE AND PROFESSOR OF PSYCHIATRIC HAROLD GOLDENSHALF SPOKE AT A LECTURE AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY. “CRIME BY THEIR VERY NATURE IS A “HATEFUL” ACT. To characterize a crime as a Hate Crime crime is an Oxymoron , a Non sequitur.

The job of a prosecutor is to put people in jail. The U.S. Incarcerates a greater percentage of its population than any other country including Russia, North Korea, China and Iran. Prosecutors use the false designation to enhance sentences by classifying them has not only a crime but a Hate Crime.
Does it make any difference to a murder victim if he was killed by someone who loved him or “hated” him?
However it will make a big difference to the offender if the prosecutor can some how establish that the crime was committed as a result of “hate” verses “love”. The designation of the term “hate” crime represents an unconstitutional device by which law enforcement can attempt to justify “longer” prison sentences and should be eliminated from the legal lexicon and statutory law.” By Leo Stoller View this Author's Spotlight

7 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Horoscope

1/28/2012 12:46:51 pm

Mars is rising in your sign.

What kind of parent can terminate the medical insurance coverage of a developmentally disabled offspring in order to make it impossible to take his daily prescriptions of Lipitor, Risperidone, Lithium Carbonate, Levothyroxine, Clonidine, Benztropine and Hydrochlorothiazide which cost about $800 a month without medical insurance. And make it impossible to visit his doctors monthly along with his therapist and go to the hospital if necessary?
Only the most ugly and “hateful” human being who no longer deserves the designation of parent would commit such a “hate crime” against its off spring.

But of course you would never do such a “hateful” thing now would you?

the law

1/28/2012 02:41:03 pm

thanks for the two photos showing a location we can determine. We will snap him up now

your horoscope white trash

1/28/2012 02:42:02 pm

Before the year is out Leo you will run out of ways to continue the federal matter. Your aging lawyer will do you no good in the federal system, plea bargains without prison time will be rejected and before the year is out you will be living at a federal bureau of prisons facility, Getting more then "8" years you will not be eligible for a camp or minimum security

Your Mother

1/28/2012 02:44:29 pm

I never should have let that Negro fuck me when I was 8 months pregnant with you. I'm sure had he not been banging your head with his 12 inch black cock you wouldn't have been nearly as fucked up as you are. I should have taken it in my ass instead or just let your dad suck it as usual

blahahahahahahahahahah

1/28/2012 09:42:14 pm

The "Real" Law

1/28/2012 11:41:30 pm

Kidnapping is a "real" Federal Crime not a "phony" made up charge for doing "nothing" different than 180 million people do a year, that kidnapping is a "real" Federal Charge and you will do a lot more than 8 "years" for "snapping" him .

Incidentally, you're obviously in the wrong profession. Since you can predict the "future". You could be making millions on Wall Street instead of barely eking out a living doing what you're doing.

chris

1/31/2012 07:35:03 am

Leo- I miss you everyday. Come visit me in prison brother of mine. I'm sure they will let you in. You might not get out, but they will let you in!

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics