Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

  • SUE THE BASTARDS
  • AEAE
  • AEJE
  • AEIPR
  • Rentamark
  • Archrive
  • PAGE 2
 

TRIAL COURT JUDGES FIND THE CONSTITUTION A “HINDERANCE” TO THEIR ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE

5/15/2010

15 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-IN A 10 YEAR STUDY JUST RELEASED BY THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) an attorney ethics watch dog group since 1974, found that well over 80% of trial court judges have no respect for a parties U.S Constitutional Rights under the First, Fifth and fourteen amendments of the U.S Constitution. In Cook County Illinois the courts have an abysmal record for up holding a parties constitutional rights. During the 80's fifteen judges went to jail in Chicago, including the Chief Chancery Judge, David Shields. Today, the old time lawyers will tell you that “case law means nothing in the Court house known as the Chicago DALY CENTER, 30 floors), its who you know and who you contribute to, the judges political campaign”. That will determine the outcome of your case, not the merits.
The AEAE study found that the higher one moves up in the “food” chain the more respect shown to the U.S. Constitution and due process rights by appeals courts.
State Appellate Courts on average show only about 50% more deference to a parties constitutional rights when rendering an Opinion than a State Court Trial Judge.
For the following reason. Every party has an automatic right to Appeal a final judgment to an Appellate Court.

However, from that point forward to the State Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court its like winning the lottery to even have one's case considered. State Supreme Courts select about 1% of the cases that are appealed and the U.S. Supreme Court accepts less than ½ of one percent of the cases that reach the high court. When the U.S. Supreme Court was founded in 1779 there were about 3 million Americans. Today we have 100 times more people (300 million) and still only “one” supreme court of nine justices to handle a million times more controversies. Consequently, the U.S. Supreme Court which only accommodates 50 to 60 appeals a year from over 10,000 submitted can only be considered a “show” court and not an actual court that a U.S. Citizen can rely on for obtaining justice. This story continues click on here to read “Why there is no justice in America” http://freedom-school.com/why_there_is_no_justice_in_america.pdf That is why new comers to the justice system will lose every time! Because no one cares about their constitutional rights.

15 Comments
Practicing full blast 24/7
5/14/2010 04:08:25 pm

Today Saturday will file a Mandamus Action, suing an Appellate Court before the State Supreme Court. Will finish a U.S. Supreme Court Appeal brief and mail it in Monday. Thirdly if there is any time, will prepare another Malicious Prosecution Law suit and this one will be juiced with a Civil Racketeering Count. Legal Insurance companies do not cover Rico Actions so the attorneys who will be sued will lose their own property when they lose the case. All in a week ends work. There is "no" rest for the wicked.

Reply
Sunday
5/14/2010 04:27:45 pm

Have to write a counter claim
Motion to Intervene
Response to a Motion for Judgement
A Petition for Indirect Criminal Contempt charging two more lawyers and their client with criminal contempt
Motion for Summary Judgment
Petition for leave to file an Appeal
et al
In addition next week in Court every day. It's now 1:30AM Saturday Morning, I guess we will call it a day.

Reply
an attorney
5/14/2010 10:03:52 pm

I practice law leo. People like you don't nor have they earned the right to use the term. As to all the things your going to file, who cares?

Reply
Reality
5/15/2010 03:49:46 am

You are nothing but the equivalent of a fifth-grader who dresses up for Halloween. He might really want to be an astronaut. He might want everyone to think he's anstronaut. He might even read a few books and at times manage to sound like an astronaut. But when you get right down to it, it is still a childish charade and the kid has zero chance of going to the moon.

Too bad you never learned the difference between dressing up for Halloween and real life, Leo. Good luck there, sport.

Reply
Reality Check
5/15/2010 05:50:39 am

Tell that to the defendants who, over the last 30 years, are estimated by the media to have spend over One hundred (100 millions) dollars defending against claims raised by the most vexatious litigator in the US.
Guess their millions of dollars spend was not "real" money, because of course, the claims were not "valid"! Whether a party dresses up as a lawyer or is a lawyer, the defendants spend the same US Dollars defending against those claims. When your sued it doesn't matter if your sued by Santa Claus, you still have to defend.
So lets cut the shit out for once and for all as to who pretending to be what, who ever sues you, you pay "real" dollars to defend it wheither it is a "freak show" or a real knock down drag out legal battle as portrayed here. As to who cares what is filed, just asks the 1000's of defendants who have to pay 10's of thousands of dollars each week, every week, for the last 35 plus years, to respond, which according to the Wall Street Journal figures totals over 100 million "real" dollars.

Reply
Click Here link
5/15/2010 08:27:33 am

And you gain nothing. Time and time again. In fact you lose frequently. Just look at the judgements against you and the mac bar against you for starters. Too bad you are not a lawyer you could of been cashing in on all those dollars. I mean you spend so much time with the law it's a shame you couldn't reap anything. Oh well next lifetime.

Reply
Gorignak
5/15/2010 02:21:07 pm

The first amenmdent gives me the right to say that, in my opinion, Leo Stoller is a faker, a poser, who wastes the resources of the court system with his vexatious and retarded "lawsuites". What would happen if Leo Stoller, instead of playing lawyer, actually turned his attention to something that mattered? Like trying to free wrongly convicted prisoners? Or protesting outside Westboro church?

Reply
Prime You Body for the Ultimate Experience
5/15/2010 03:40:16 pm

Charles Heston once said on Milton Rosenberg's radio program 720am in Chicago, that he "was lucky enough to be getting paid for what he would otherwise do for free." I was lucky that for 42 years since 1968 to the current date I too was lucky enough to do what I most enjoyed and if I ever got compensation for doing it, that was a plus, but never my motive

Reply
The Military
5/15/2010 03:56:39 pm

It is easy to understand Leo

Look at his fathers Military records, partticularly relevant now that memorial day is arriving:

The records show:

Russell Stoller was a coward
He turned his airplane away from enemy activity repeatedly
He then bombed schools and hospitals
His crew refused to fly with him
He was returned to the United States in disgrace and kicked out of the military
Then he created Leo
Then he taught Leo how to cheat people
and then he filed bankruptcy also and taught Leo how to do it

Any question as to why Leo is such white trash?

Reply
You got it wrong
5/15/2010 04:17:23 pm

Russell was in the Army air corp. He qualified to fly in 17 different air craft. He was a captain. He flew over 73 mission during the war in a C47. He saved hundreds of lives. He was a war hero. His plane was shot down three times. On the same days that his planes was shot down he got into another plane to fly another mission. It was heros like Russell that we won the second world war. He made the greatest generation in American history the greatest generation. You got your facts wrong. We have his medals to prove it. Russell is in heaven now, still flying only for the Lord now...

Reply
Hahahahaha
5/15/2010 05:01:32 pm

blahahahahaha if Leo is in possession of any medals from the military blahahahaha he probably forged those too blahhahahahahahaha

Reply
Stoller = Asshat
5/18/2010 09:06:02 am

Stoller's father a war hero? He, like Leo, was widely documented as a bankrupt, a cheat, a coward and general scumbag. Medals? What a pathetic joke and an insult to those who actually served their country, unlike the Stoller family asshats.

Reply
adidas shoes outlet link
6/7/2010 03:30:27 pm

Hhe article's content rich variety which make us move for our mood after reading this article. surprise, here you will find what you want! Recently, I found some wedsites which commodity is colorful of fashion. Such as www.sec-torand.com that worth you to see. Believe me these websites won’t let you down.

Reply
vibram five fingers link
6/7/2010 07:20:55 pm

Very vivid appearance, perfect plot, challenging game. Many of us put this game as a very important part of life. Surprise,when I browse the web ,I found these website Pretty good. such as xxxxxx, go and see it that rich variety of fashion at a reasonable www.vibram five fingers kso price !recommended by friends.Personally

Reply
dior handbags link
6/8/2010 03:42:28 pm

Here elaborates the matter not only extensively but also detailly .I support the
write's unique point.It is useful and benefit to your daily life.You can go those
sits to know more relate things.They are strongly recommended by friends.Personally www.dboe-for.com

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
    Internships not available now
    ​


     Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
    FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​
    YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
    Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
     The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
     Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that  supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
     The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen  v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
    Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements 
    David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing  Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58  (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law  on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained  one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing  Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836  F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
    AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. 
    The author(s)  graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. The Author(s)  are the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics experts  and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation  Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions.  AEAE, P.O.  Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
    312-545-4554
    Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE  Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
     "Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
    Litigation is the Air We Breathe
    Litigation is War,

    Welcome to the Front!"


     To Prove Defamation Case?
    What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm. 
    The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation 

    The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

    “[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
    AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

    ​AEAE has the legal  right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators,  business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE  18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

    VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT


    DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.


    Archives

    April 2025
    March 2025
    January 2025
    March 2024
    February 2024
    September 2023
    July 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    July 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    January 2015
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Categories
    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested  persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

    All
    Jewelry Frauds
    Scams
    Yellow Diamonds

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.